Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Mar 6;73(2):646–654. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25190

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Selected slices from 3D acquisitions in an example patient both without (a) and with (b) dynamic-TI, together with sequence repeat time interval histograms. The dynamic-TI algorithm results in less ghosting in the left-right phase encode direction and improved image quality. The image quality score increased from 2 to 3 with the dynamic-TI algorithm. The window width and level have been set to best demonstrate the artefact levels in the images. The repeat time intervals were similar in the acquisitions with and without dynamic-TI (standard deviation as a percentage of the mean 25.1% and 24.8% respectively).