Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 31;172(18):4454–4468. doi: 10.1111/bph.13229

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Electrical resistance of murine endothelial cell monolayers treated with either vehicle or (A) PGE2 or the (B) EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 at the indicated concentrations. (C). Cells were treated with PGE2 (30 nmol·L−1) or (D) the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (30 nmol·L−1) alone or in the presence of the EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (1 μmol·L−1, 15 min pretreatment). Data are shown as mean normalized resistance + SEM of four independent experiments performed in duplicate. Data were analysed by two-way anova for repeated measurements and multiple comparisons were calculated with Tukey’s post test. ***P < 0.001 as compared with vehicle; ###P < 0.001 as compared with PGE2 or the EP4 agonist. (E) EP4 receptor expression on murine pulmonary microvascular cells using flow cytometry (typical example of n = 3). AB, antibody.