Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 5;10(9):1383–1394. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1164-7

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Bland-Altman plots, comparing the results of minimal cap thickness assessed in the training set, for the proposed automatic method and the manual tracings performed by the two analysts A1 and A2. The solid and dashed lines represent the bias and the 95% limits of agreement, respectively