Table 10.
Group | ROI | χ2 | p |
---|---|---|---|
ANOOx versus rsCONOx | V2 | χ2(1,5) = 2330.462 | 0.659 |
V3 | χ2(1,5) = 2085.337 | 0.874 | |
rsEBUW versus rsCONUW | V2 | χ2(1,4) = 2913.112* | 0.066 |
V3 | χ2(1,4) = 2330.266* | 0.501 | |
rsCONUW versus stimCONUW | V2 | χ2(1,4) = 3578.361** | 0.001 |
V3 | χ2(1,4) = 4263.147** | 0.000 |
*Significant values.
**Statistical values that passed Bonferroni–Holm correction for three comparisons.