Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 3;50(4):403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.06.010

Table 4.

Range of motion versus types of fracture.

Flexion–extension functional ROM Pronation–supination functional ROM
Coronoid fracture Yes n (%) No n (%) p value Yes n (%) No n (%) p value
 Type 1 7 (70) 3 (30) 9 1
 Type 2 2 (100) 0 2 0
 Type 3 1 (33) 2 (67) 1 2
 Total 10 (66.7) 5 (33.3) 0.27 12 (80) 3 (20) 0.07



Radial head fracture Yes n (%) No p value Yes n (%) No p value
 Type 2 4 (80) 1 (20) 4 1
 Type 3 6 (60) 4 (40) 8 2
 Total 10 (66.7) 5 (33.3) 0.43 12 (80) 3 (20) 0.99



Scores versus type of fracture
DASH MEPS VAS
Coronoid fracture Median p value Median p value Median p value
 Type 1 10 97.5 0
 Type 2 26.67 0.15 72.5 0.07 3 0.11
 Type 3 77.5 60 4



Radial head fracture Median p value Median p value Median p value
 Type 2 14.16 0.58 95 0.62 2 0.7
 Type 3 26.67 90 0

ROM, range of motion; n, number; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; MEPS, Mayo Elbow Performance Score; VAS, visual analog scale.