Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e009138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009138

Table 2.

Magnitude of ΔPRI as compared to magnitude of ΔSEC for face-to-face (A) and teleconference (B) settings as a percentage of the magnitude subgroup and the data set as a whole

(A) Face-to-Face
(B) Teleconference
Primary Secondary Subgroup (%) Whole (%) Primary Secondary Subgroup (%) Whole (%)
High High 17.9 1.9 High High 7.1 0.5
High Moderate 14.3 1.5 High Moderate 21.4 1.4
High Low 14.3 1.5 High Low 7.1 0.5
High Zero 53.6 5.8 High Zero 64.3 4.2
Total 100.0 10.8 Total 100.0 6.6
Moderate High 13.5 3.8 Moderate High 5.0 0.9
Moderate Moderate 16.2 6.9 Moderate Moderate 27.5 5.2
Moderate Low 24.3 4.6 Moderate Low 20.0 3.8
Moderate Zero 45.9 13.1 Moderate Zero 47.5 9.0
Total 100.0 28.5 Total 100.0 18.9
Low High 8.8 1.9 Low High 5.0 0.9
Low Moderate 36.8 8.1 Low Moderate 15.0 2.8
Low Low 12.3 2.7 Low Low 25.0 4.7
Low Zero 42.1 9.2 Low Zero 55.0 10.4
Total 100.0 21.9 Total 100.0 18.9
Zero High 19.8 7.7 Zero High 10.2 5.7
Zero Moderate 25.7 10.0 Zero Moderate 19.5 10.8
Zero Low 19.8 7.7 Zero Low 19.5 10.8
Zero Zero 34.7 13.5 Zero Zero 50.8 28.3
Total 100.0 38.8 Total 100.0 55.7

High, >|0.5|; Low, |0.1| to |0.2|; Moderate, |0.3| to |0.5|; zero is Δ=0.