Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;2015(9):CD004265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004265.pub3

Carabin 1997 CAN.

Methods Cluster‐RCT
Allocation sequence: day‐care centres were stratified by incidence of respiratory infections and block randomized by geographical areas
Allocation concealment: unclear
Blinding: none
Inclusion of participants in the analysis: unclear
Length of follow‐up: 6 months
Cluster‐adjustment method: adjusted
Participants Number: 52 day‐care centres, with 1729 children
Inclusion criteria: presence of at least 1 sandbox and 1 play area; at least 12 available toddler places
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Age: 18 months to 3 years
Interventions Intervention (see Table 5 for detailed description):
  1. Large group hygiene training (educators)

  2. Handouts


Control:
  1. No intervention

Outcomes Diarrhoea rates
Notes Location: Quebec, Canada
Duration: September 1996 to November 1997
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated‐ block randomized.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 43 children lost to follow‐up (5 day care centres excluded from the analysis).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None observed.
Other bias Low risk None observed.