Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;2015(9):CD004265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004265.pub3

Luby 2003a PAK.

Methods Cluster‐RCT
Allocation sequence: computer‐generated
Allocation concealment: serially numbered
Blinding: none
Inclusion of participants in the analysis: unclear
Length of follow‐up: 12 months
Cluster‐adjustment method: adjusted
Participants Number: 36 neighbourhoods (25 intervention, 11 control), with 4691 children (3163 intervention, 1528 control)
Inclusion criteria: household located in the trial area; have at least 2 children < 5 years; intention to reside in the house for the duration of trial
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Age: < 15 years
Interventions Intervention (see Table 5 for detailed description):
  1. Large group training using slide shows, pamphlets, and video tapes


Control:
  1. No intervention

Outcomes Diarrhoeal rates
Notes Location: low‐income squatter settlements, Karachi, Pakistan
Duration: April 2002 to April 2003
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Adequate.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 139 children from the intervention arm and 85 from the control arm out of the 4691 children originally enrolled were lost to follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None observed.
Other bias Low risk None observed.