. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.

Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Feb;80(1):116–139. doi: 10.1177/0003122414564008

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models of the Consequences for Women of Supportive Policies and Education on Relationship Structure Preferences (Full Sample)

	Egalitarian Relationship		Neotraditional Relationship
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
Supportive Policies	0.768	0.0197	−0.594	0.380
	(0.552)	(0.689)	(0.593)	(0.735)
Higher Education Level	1.079	0.229	−0.729	0.345
	(0.562)	(0.734)	(0.596)	(0.758)
Supportive Policies X Higher Education	--	2.272^*	--	−2.812^*
	--	(1.124)	--	(1.197)
Constant	−0.0145	0.399	−0.441	−0.988^*
	(0.391)	(0.428)	(0.393)	(0.463)

n	133	133	133	133

Notes: Log-odds are presented. Standard errors in parentheses. Weights used in all models. Listwise deletion used for missing data. Analyses include respondents who failed the manipulation check.

p < .05

** p < .01

*** p < .001 (two-tailed tests).