. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Jun 17;120(4):474–482.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.023

Table 4.

Level of agreement in lesion diagnoses after Initial Review Stage. Cells contain the count of slide pairs with the column label showing the diagnosis of one reviewer and the row label showing the diagnosis of the other reviewer. The actual identity of the reviewer is not reflected in this table; rather it reports all of the observed diagnostic combinations after the Initial Review Stage. The diagonal cells (gray) contain the count of diagnostic pairs where both reviewers were in complete agreement in their diagnosis. For example: the cell where the “Benign” column crosses with the “Dysplastic Mild” row represents 128 subject biopsies where one reviewer diagnosed one slide as benign and the other reviewer diagnosed the other slide as dysplastic mild.

Percentage Agreement 69.9%	Normal	Benign	Dysplastic Mild	Dysplastic Moderate	Dysplastic Severe	Dysplastic Carcinoma in situ	Malignant
Normal	0	Benign
Benign	1	408
Dysplastic Mild	0	128	31
Dysplastic Moderate	0	41	38	14
Dysplastic Sever	0	8	4	16	5
Dysplastic Carcinoma in situ	0	0	0	1	1	3
Malignant	1	5	3	2	5	1	130