. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 9.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015 Mar 9;45(5):668–680. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004679

Table 3.

Regression of Wave 2 CATS Scales onto Wave 1 Child and Parent Reports of Harsh Parenting (HP) and Peer Victimization (PV)

Effect	Model comparison	ΔR²	test	p
DV = CATS Social threat W2
Combined effect of HP & PV	models 3 vs. 1	.15	ΔF_(4,208) = 8.84	.005
Total effect of HP ignoring PV	models 2 vs. 1	.10	ΔF_(2,210) = 11.48	.001
Total effect of PV ignoring HP	models 4 vs. 1	.08	ΔF_(2,210) = 8.14	.001
Unique effect of HP controlling PV	models 3 vs. 2	.07	ΔF_(2,208) = 8.73	.001
Unique effect of PV controlling HP	models 5 vs. 4	.05	ΔF_(2,208) = 5.53	.005

DV = CATS Personal failure W2
Combined effect of HP & PV	models 3 vs. 1	.06	ΔF_(4,208) = 3.86	.001
Total effect of HP ignoring PV	models 2 vs. 1	.06	ΔF_(2,210) = 7.33	.001
Total effect of PV ignoring HP	models 4 vs. 1	.01	ΔF_(2,210) = 0.85	ns
Unique effect of HP controlling PV	models 3 vs. 2	.06	ΔF_(2,208) = 6.80	.001
Unique effect of PV controlling HP	models 5 vs. 4	.00	ΔF_(2,208) = 0.43	ns

Note. CATS = Children’s Automatic Thoughts Scale