Table 4.

Model Comparisons in the Regression of Wave 2 CTI-C Scales onto Wave 1 Child and Parent Reports of Harsh Parenting (HP) and Peer Victimization (PV)

Effect	Model comparison	ΔR2	test	p
DV = CTI-C Negative W2
Combined effect of HP & PV	models 3 vs. 1	.10	ΔF(4,208) = 7.03	.001
Total effect of HP ignoring PV	models 2 vs. 1	.07	ΔF(2,210) = 10.28	.001
Total effect of PV ignoring HP	models 4 vs. 1	.03	ΔF(2,210) = 4.38	.005
Unique effect of HP controlling PV	models 3 vs. 2	.07	ΔF(2,208) = 9.22	.001
Unique effect of PV controlling HP	models 5 vs. 4	.02	ΔF(2,208) = 3.46	.014
DV = CTI-C Positive W2
Combined effect of HP & PV	models 3 vs. 1	.06	ΔF(4,208) = 4.10	.004
Total effect of HP ignoring PV	models 2 vs. 1	.05	ΔF(2,210) = 6.75	.002
Total effect of PV ignoring HP	models 4 vs. 1	.02	ΔF(2,210) = 2.73	ns
Unique effect of HP controlling PV	models 3 vs. 2	.04	ΔF(2,208) = 5.31	.006
Unique effect of PV controlling HP	models 5 vs. 4	.01	ΔF(2,208) = 1.41	ns

Note. CTI-C = Children’s Cognitive Triad Inventory