Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015 Mar 9;45(5):668–680. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004679

Table 5.

Model Comparisons in the Regression of Wave 2 SPPC Scales onto Wave 1 Child and Parent Reports of Harsh Parenting (HP) and Peer Victimization (PV)

Effect Model comparison ΔR2 test p
DV = SPPC Social acceptance W2
Combined effect of HP & PV models 3 vs. 1 .13 ΔF(4,208) = 11.55 .001
Total effect of HP ignoring PV models 2 vs. 1 .01 ΔF(2,210) = 1.27 ns
Total effect of PV ignoring HP models 4 vs. 1 .12 ΔF(2,210) = 19.61 .001
Unique effect of HP controlling PV models 3 vs. 2 .02 ΔF(2,208) = 2.98 ns
Unique effect of PV controlling HP models 5 vs. 4 .12 ΔF(2,208) = 21.48 .001

DV = SPPC Physical appearance W2
Combined effect of HP & PV models 3 vs. 1 .06 ΔF(4,208) = 3.97 .004
Total effect of HP ignoring PV models 2 vs. 1 .06 ΔF(2,210) = 7.50 .001
Total effect of PV ignoring HP models 4 vs. 1 .01 ΔF(2,210) = 1.73 ns
Unique effect of HP controlling PV models 3 vs. 2 .05 ΔF(2,208) = 6.09 .003
Unique effect of PV controlling HP models 5 vs. 4 .00 ΔF(2,208) = 0.49 ns

DV = SPPC Global self-worth W2
Combined effect of HP & PV models 3 vs. 1 .08 ΔF(4,208) = 4.55 .002
Total effect of HP ignoring PV models 2 vs. 1 .08 ΔF(2,210) = 8.89 .001
Total effect of PV ignoring HP models 4 vs. 1 .02 ΔF(2,210) = 1.56 ns
Unique effect of HP controlling PV models 3 vs. 2 .06 ΔF(2,208) = 7.40 .001
Unique effect of PV controlling HP models 5 vs. 4 .00 ΔF(2,208) = 0.29 ns

Note. SPPC = Self-Perception Profile for Children.