Table 5.
Model Comparisons in the Regression of Wave 2 SPPC Scales onto Wave 1 Child and Parent Reports of Harsh Parenting (HP) and Peer Victimization (PV)
Effect | Model comparison | ΔR2 | test | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
DV = SPPC Social acceptance W2 | ||||
Combined effect of HP & PV | models 3 vs. 1 | .13 | ΔF(4,208) = 11.55 | .001 |
Total effect of HP ignoring PV | models 2 vs. 1 | .01 | ΔF(2,210) = 1.27 | ns |
Total effect of PV ignoring HP | models 4 vs. 1 | .12 | ΔF(2,210) = 19.61 | .001 |
Unique effect of HP controlling PV | models 3 vs. 2 | .02 | ΔF(2,208) = 2.98 | ns |
Unique effect of PV controlling HP | models 5 vs. 4 | .12 | ΔF(2,208) = 21.48 | .001 |
DV = SPPC Physical appearance W2 | ||||
Combined effect of HP & PV | models 3 vs. 1 | .06 | ΔF(4,208) = 3.97 | .004 |
Total effect of HP ignoring PV | models 2 vs. 1 | .06 | ΔF(2,210) = 7.50 | .001 |
Total effect of PV ignoring HP | models 4 vs. 1 | .01 | ΔF(2,210) = 1.73 | ns |
Unique effect of HP controlling PV | models 3 vs. 2 | .05 | ΔF(2,208) = 6.09 | .003 |
Unique effect of PV controlling HP | models 5 vs. 4 | .00 | ΔF(2,208) = 0.49 | ns |
DV = SPPC Global self-worth W2 | ||||
Combined effect of HP & PV | models 3 vs. 1 | .08 | ΔF(4,208) = 4.55 | .002 |
Total effect of HP ignoring PV | models 2 vs. 1 | .08 | ΔF(2,210) = 8.89 | .001 |
Total effect of PV ignoring HP | models 4 vs. 1 | .02 | ΔF(2,210) = 1.56 | ns |
Unique effect of HP controlling PV | models 3 vs. 2 | .06 | ΔF(2,208) = 7.40 | .001 |
Unique effect of PV controlling HP | models 5 vs. 4 | .00 | ΔF(2,208) = 0.29 | ns |
Note. SPPC = Self-Perception Profile for Children.