Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;20(4):1053–1060. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9585-1

Table 1.

Influence of checklists on eye tracking variables related to enhanced analytic scrutiny during diagnostic verification

Measure Hypothesis comparing checklists (CH) versus analytic prompts (AP) Data
Verification with checklist µ ± SD Verification with analytic prompt µ ± SD F 1,15 p η 2
Task time (seconds) CH > AP 32 ± 21 21 ± 15 11.8 .004 .24
Number of fixations CH > AP 88 ± 71 52 ± 37 16.8 .001 .23
Scan path length (megapixels) CH > AP 13.1 ± 8.8 7.9 ± 4.8 12.4 .003 .23
Ratio of intra to extra lead saccades CH > AP 8.1 ± 5.4 6.1 ± 4.5 10.0 .006 .07
Ratio of local to global saccades (i.e. saccades <1.1° vs. >1.1°) CH > AP .37 ± .12 .33 ± .14 6.5 .02 .04
Proportion of the 12 leads with at least one fixation CH > AP .65 ± .20 .55 ± .23 21.3 .001 .08