Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 25;71(10):1237–1244. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1

Table 2.

Categories of ‘potential serious risk to public health’ objections raised leading to CMDh referrals and licensing failure during CMDh referrals

Main category Subcategoriesa Total, n Licensing failure, n Percent Risk ratio (95 % CI)
Clinical (study design issues) 64 21 33 % Ref
Clinical (equivalence) 64 21 33 % 1.0 (0.6–1.6)
 Bioequivalence/therapeutic equivalence not demonstrated 39 15 38 % 1.2 (0.7–2.0)
 Bioequivalence/therapeutic equivalence not investigated in subgroup 25 6 24 % 0.7 (0.3–1.6)
Clinical (benefit risk concerns) 83 8 10 % 0.3 (0.1–0.6)
 Insufficient data to support B/R in claimed indications 34 7 21 % 0.6 (0.3–1.3)
 Safety concerns 19 0 0 % NA
 Overall benefit/risk negative 18 1 6 % 0.2 (0.0–1.1)
 Posology concerns 12 0 0 % NA
Quality 38 3 8 % 0.2 (0.1–0.8)
 Concerns on quality or manufacturing parameters 35 3 9 % 0.3 (0.1–0.8)
 Packaging concerns/medication errors 3 0 0 % NA
Regulatory/procedural 40 2 5 % 0.2 (0.0–0.6)
 Concerns about SmPC wording 30 1 3 % 0.1 (0.0–0.7)
 Administrative concerns (including patient leaflet /SmPC issues) 10 1 10 % 0.3 (0.0–2.0)
Multiple objections from different categories 88 15 17 % 0.5 (0.3–0.9)
Overall 377 70 19 %

aFor a detailed description of the categories, see supplementary information Table S2