Table 4. Comparison of orbital energy values of hit compounds and training set compounds calculated by DFT.
| Name | HOMO (eV) | LUMO (eV) | ΔEa (eV) | IC50 (nmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asinex_139155 (Hit 1) | −0.189 | −0.067 | 0.122 | |
| Asinex_178779 (Hit 3) | −0.195 | −0.067 | 0.127 | |
| Asinex_22867 | −0.195 | −0.039 | 0.155 | |
| Asinex_132856 (Hit 2) | −0.195 | −0.068 | 0.127 | |
| Asinex_142787 | −0.196 | −0.064 | 0.132 | |
| NCI_127946 | −0.196 | −0.047 | 0.148 | |
| Training 1 | −0.196 | −0.068 | 0.128 | 4.7 |
| Training 3 | −0.205 | −0.077 | 0.128 | 7.6 |
| Training 4 | −0.209 | −0.073 | 0.135 | 8.6 |
| Training 12 | −0.215 | −0.066 | 0.149 | 480 |
| Training 15 | −0.224 | −0.068 | 0.155 | 1 400 |
| Training 19 | −0.229 | −0.040 | 0.189 | 9 600 |
| Training 23 | −0.244 | −0.042 | 0.202 | 63 000 |
a ΔE: energy gap (band gap) is the difference between HOMO and LUMO.