Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):10274–10283.

Table 2.

HRs and 95% CIs for patient survival (OS) in association with MUC4 expression in enrolled studies

First author Publication year Detecting method Cut-off value Case Number HR (95% CI)

High expression Low expression OS DFS/RFS/PFS
Higashi1 2015 IHC-8G7 10% 106 8 1.00 (0.31-4.12) M NA
Majhi 2013 NA Score >12 16 13 0.32 (0.05-1.92) U* NA
Khanh 2013 IHC-1G8 5% 68 138 1.51 (0.91-2.53)M 2.30 (1.21-4.36) M
Lee 2012 IHC-1G8 5% 35 28 2.89 (0.884-9.451) M NA
Higashi2 2012 IHC-8G7 5% 19 44 1.73 (0.83-3.60) M NA
Hamada 2012 IHC-8G7 5% 61 89 1.619 (1.115-2.409) M 1.00 (0.97-1.03) U*
Yi Zhu 2011 qRT-PCR 50% 29 28 2.571 (1.277-5.177) M NA
Shanmugam 2010 IHC-8G7 75% 33 99 2.07 (1.14-3.75) M NA
Aloysius 2010 IHC-1G8 5% 53 51 1.79 (0.88-3.7) M NA
Yeh CN 2009 IHC-1G8 1% 13 38 3.40 (1.56-7.41) M NA
Westgaard 2009 IHC-1G8 10% 44 21 2.02 (1.02-3.98) U* NA
Tsutsumida 2007 IHC-8G7 25% 25 160 3.21 (1.39-7.42) U* 1.00 (0.96-1.04) U*
Morrison 2007 IHC-1G8 5% 69 226 2.15 (0.85-5.48) M 1.44 (0.51-4.04) M
Tamada 2006 IHC-8G7 5% 19 51 2.655 (1.125-6.625) M NA
Chauhan 2006 IHC-8G7 25% 23 15 1.61 (0.5-5.23) U* NA
Saitou 2005 IHC-8G7 5% 21 114 1.956 (1.13-3.384) M NA
Weed 2004 IHC-1G8 10% 19 130 0.27 (0.08-0.88) M 0.27 (0.10-0.77) M
Shibahara 2004 IHC-8G7 5% 10 17 4.560 (1.190-17.478) M NA

The source of HR and 95% CI is described as derived from univariate analysis (U) or multivariateanalysis (M).

*

HR and 95% CI calculated from survival curves.

OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, HR (high vslow); qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; NA, not available; IHC-1G8: Immunohistochemistryusing 1G8 antibody; IHC-8G7: Immunohistochemistry using 8G7 antibody.