Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):10274–10283.

Table 3.

Main results of meta-analysis

Categories Studies Patients MUC4+ HRs 95% CI Heterogeneity P

I-Square Ph
Overall 18 1933 663 1.87 1.58-2.23 28.00% 0.13 <0.001
Cancer type
Lung cancer 2 214 41 1.18 0.13-11.05 80.30% 0.024 0.888
    Colorectal cancer 2 338 101 1.73 1.17-2.54 0.00% 0.431 0.006
    Biliary tract carcinoma 6 378 149 2.41 1.69-3.42 0.00% 0.67 <0.001
    Pancreatic cancer 4 371 200 2.01 1.42-2.86 0.00% 0.659 <0.001
    Others 4 632 172 1.22 0.59-2.55 65.00% 0.035 0.589
Geography
    Western 7 812 257 1.4 0.84-2.33 54.20% 0.041 0.191
    Asian 11 1121 406 1.99 1.63-2.44 0.00% 0.503 <0.001
Methods
    IHC-1G8 7 933 301 1.74 1.11-2.75 55.50% 0.036 0.017
    IHC-8G7 9 914 317 1.93 1.54-2.42 0.00% 0.698 <0.001
    Others 2 86 45 1.08 0.14-8.10 77.10% 0.037 0.938
Cut-off Value
    >5% 9 1113 355 1.83 1.48-2.27 0.00% 0.839 <0.001
Study quality
    High 14 1333 506 1.99 1.66-2.39 0.00% 0.738 <0.001
    Low 4 600 157 0.89 0.32-2.47 71.90% 0.014 0.825

IHC-1G8: Immunohistochemistry using 1G8 clone antibody, IHC-8G7: Immunohistochemistry using 8G7 clone antibody, MUC4+: MUC4 positive patients number, Ph: PHeterogeneity; HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval.