Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):10845–10854.

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of the association between MMP-12 82A/G polymorphism and cancer risk

Subgroup analysis G allele vs A (Allele model) GG+A/G vs AA (Dominant model) GG vs A/G+AA (Recessive model) GG vs AA (Homozygous model) GG vs A/G (Heterozygous model)

OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Number of studies 11 11 6 6 6
A>G 1 0.91-1.10 0.99 1.04 0.87-1.24 0.69 1.03 0.70-1.52 0.87 1.02 0.69-1.50 0.91 1.06 0.72-1.58 0.75
Ethnicity
    Caucasians 0.94 0.84-1.06 0.32 0.93 0.82-1.06 0.28 0.99 0.66-1.51 0.98 0.98 0.64-1.48 0.91 1.05 0.68-1.60 0.83
    Asians 1.09 0.89-1.35 0.41 1.16 0.81-1.66 0.42 1.98 0.42-9.32 0.38 1.97 0.42-9.28 0.21 2.19 0.47-10.29 0.17
    Mixed 1.29 0.93-1.79 0.13 1.36 0.95-1.94 0.09 0.87 0.21-3.67 0.85 0.93 0.22-3.92 0.92 0.67 0.15-2.91 0.59
Genotype methods
    PCR-RFLP 1.33 0.76-2.33 0.32 1.33 0.76-2.31 0.317 NA NA NA
    Non-PCR-RFLP 0.96 0.85-1.09 0.55 0.96 0.85-1.09 0.554 1.03 0.70-1.52 0.88 1.02 0.69-1.50 0.92 1.06 0.72-1.58 0.75
Tumor type
    CRC 0.9 0.70-1.15 0.41 0.86 0.65-1.13 0.275 1.24 0.54-2.86 0.61 1.18 0.51-2.74 0.69 1.43 0.60-3.39 0.42
    LC 0.98 0.84-1.13 0.76 1 0.85-1.18 0.99 0.75 0.44-1.28 0.3 0.76 0.45-1.29 0.31 0.43-1.28 0.29
    EOC 2.45 1.46-4.10 0.001 2.52 1.49-4.24 0.001 NA NA 0.74 NA
    ESCC 0.67 0.35-1.26 0.21 0.66 0.34-1.26 0.21 NA NA NA
    EA 1.29 0.93-1.79 0.13 1.36 0.95-1.94 0.09 0.87 0.21-3.67 0.85 0.93 0.22-3.92 0.92 0.67 0.15-2.91 0.59
    GCA 1.08 0.59-1.97 0.79 1.08 0.59-1.99 0.79 NA NA NA
    HCC 1 0.60-1.68 0.99 1.04 0.62-1.76 0.88 0.37 0,02-9.08 0.54 0.37 0,02-9.12 0.54 0.35 0.01-8.80 0.51
    BC 0.87 0.67-1.51 0.34 0.83 0.63-1.10 0.21 2.27 0.70-7.41 0.17 2.15 0.66-7.06 0.23 2.72 0.82-9.07 0.1
    BRC 0.86 0.60-1.23 0.42 0.85 0.59-1.23 0.39 4.38 0.49-39.31 0.18 4.34 0.48-38.88 0.19 5.4 0.58-49.88 0.14

Note: W, wild allele; M, mutant allele; WW, wild homozygote; WM, heterozygote; MM, mutant homozygote; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.