Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 19;36(Suppl 1):S19–S37. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv029

Table 2.

Involvement of the cellular pathways promoting replicative immortality in the development of the hallmarks of cancer identified by Hanahan et al. (165)

Replicative immortality priority targets Deregulated metabolism Evasion of antigrowth signaling Angiogenesis Genetic instability Resistance to cell death Immune system evasion Sustained proliferative signaling Tissue invasion and metastasis Tumor promoting inflammation Tumor micro- environment
Telomerase activation + (266) + (266) + (266) + (266) + (267) + (266) + (266) + (266) + (266)) − (268)
P53 inactivation + (269) + (270) + (271) + (272) + (273) + (274) + (275) + (276) + (277) + (278)
pRb inactivation + (279) + (280) + (281) + (282) + (283) 0 + (284) + (285) + (286) + (287)
mTOR inactivation + (288) + (289) − (290) + (291) − (292) − (293) − (288) − (294 − (295) +/− (278)

Targets that were found to have opposing actions in a particular hallmark (i.e. anticarcinogenic) were denoted using ‘−’, while targets that were found to have promoting actions in a particular hallmark (i.e. pro-carcinogenic) were denoted using ‘+’. In instances where reports on relevant actions in other hallmarks were mixed (i.e. reports showing both pro-carcinogenic potential and anticarcinogenic potential), the symbols ‘+/−’ were used. Finally, in instances where no literature support was found to document the relevance of a target in a particular aspect of cancer’s biology, were denoted using ‘0’.