Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 29;186:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.013

Table 4.

Results of factorial invariance testing for the dysphoria model by sex.

Type of invariance χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA [90% CI] χ2 difference testa df p
Configural 364.903** 276 .986 .986 .040 [.028, .051] --- --- ---
Weak factorial/matric 355.216** 289 .989 .990 .034 [.020, .045] 10.332 13 .667
Strong factorial/scalar 371.943** 302 .989 .990 .034 [.020, .045] 14.679 17 .619
Strict factorialb 371.943** 302 .989 .990 .034 [.020, .045] 22.517 17 .166
Factor variance 362.178* 306 .991 .992 .030 [.014, .042] 3.539 4 .472
Factor covariance 340.518 312 .995 .996 .021 [.000, .035] 4.730 6 .579
Factor mean 335.966 316 .997 .997 .018 [.000, .033] 3.089 4 .543

Note. df = Degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation;

CI = confidence interval.

**

p < .01,

*

p < .05

a

χ2 difference test computed using the DIFFTEST option in Mplus.

b

Fit statistics for the strict factorial invariance model are the same as the strong factorial/scalar invariance model but the model was compared to one that allowed residual variances to be freely estimated across groups, as indicated with results of the χ2 difference test.