Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;22(11):3582–3589. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4385-7

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for factors contributing to being in the group with high stoma rates

Factor Univariate Multivariate
Cowboys [n (%)] Chickens [n (%)] ORa 95 % CI
Age, mean 66 66 0.99 0.98–1.01
Female sex 247 (41) 210 (40) 0.88 0.68–1.14
ASA score
 1 157 (30) 149 (30) 1.0 Ref
 2 297 (56) 307 (60) 1.13 0.76–1.36
 3+ 79 (15) 52 (10) 0.81 0.55–1.30
Urgency
 Urgent operation 18 (4) 4 (0.8) 0.29 0.09–0.89
Preoperative surgery, yes 24 (4) 25 (5) 1.19 0.64–2.24
T stage (p)
 T0 22 (4) 32 (7) 1.0 Ref
 T1 53 (9) 55 (11) 1.35 0.36–5.00
 T2 193 (32) 165 (32) 1.02 0.29–3.61
 T3 314 (52) 260 (50) 1.08 0.31–3.78
 T4 22 (4) 9 (2) 0.62 0.14–2.74
Abdominal surgical history, yes 135 (22) 144 (28) 1.26 0.94–1.70
Tumor distance—anal verge, >10 cm 225 (37) 137 (33) 0.87 0.66–1.14
Neoadjuvant therapy, none 171 (28) 100 (19) 1.0 Ref
5 × 5
 5 × 5 Gy 301 (50) 308 (60) 1.67 1.202.31
 Chemoradiation 132 (22) 133 (22) 1.13 0.72–1.69
Surgical treatment, laparoscopy 291 (50) 286 (55) 1.09 0.84–1.41
Hospital type, teaching 259 (43) 269 (52) 2.88 2.044.10
Volume
 <25 191 (32) 141 (27) 1.0 Ref
 25–50 222 (36) 274 (53) 1.18 0.86–1.62
 >50 191 (32) 106 (20) 0.27 0.170.43

Bolded data indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists

aORs display the odds for being in the group with high stoma rates