Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;5:14051. doi: 10.1038/srep14051

Table 3. Summary risk estimates of the association between menarcheal age and endometrial cancer risk, dose-response analysis of per 2 year delay.

  No. of Summary RR I2 Ph* Ph**
studies (95% CI) Value (%)
Overall 6 0.96 (0.94–0.98) 45.7 0.101
Subgroup analyses
Duration of follow-up         0.303
 <10y 2 0.97 (0.95–0.99) 44.7 0.179  
 ≥10y 4 0.95 (0.91–0.98) 33.7 0.210  
Number of cases         0.067
 <400 3 0.92 (0.89–0.96) 0 0.868  
 ≥400 3 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 0 0.388  
Exposure Assessment         0.680
 Trained interviewer 1 1.01 (0.82–1.24) N/A N/A  
 Self-administered questionnaire 6 0.96 (0.94–0.98) 55.8 0.066  
Study population         0.259
 Non-American 2 0.95 (0.91–0.98) 56.3 0.130  
 American 4 0.98 (0.96–0.99) 7.5 0.356  
Adjustment for confounders or important risk factors
Body mass index         0.067
 Yes 3 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 0 0.388  
 No 3 0.92 (0.89–0.96) 0 0.868  
Parity         0.652
 Yes 3 0.96 (0.94–0.99) 66.5 0.051  
 No 3 0.96 (0.93–0.98) 0 0.469  
Oral contraceptive use         0.080
 Yes 2 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0 0.560  
 No 4 0.95 (0.92–0.97) 12.2 0.332  
Exogenous hormones use         0.080
 Yes 2 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0 0.560  
 No 4 0.95 (0.92–0.97) 12.2 0.332  
Menopause status         0.080
 Yes 2 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0 0.560  
 No 4 0.95 (0.92–0.97) 12.2 0.332  
Smoking status         0.067
 Yes 3 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 0 0.388  
 No 3 0.92 (0.89–0.96) 0 0.868  

RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval; N/A: not available.

*P value for heterogeneity within each subgroup.

**P value for heterogeneity between subgroups with meta-regression analysis.