Table 1.
Characteristics of participants of FGD
| FGD | Participants | Number of participants | Teachers’ class | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Men | Women | Total | Class 1-3 | Class 4-8a | Missing | |
| 1 | Teachers of school 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 2 | Teachers of school 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | - | 9 | 3 |
| 3 | Teachers of school 3 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 4 | Teachers of school 4 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | Fathers of school 5 | 6 | - | 6 | NA | NA | NA |
| 6 | Fathers of school 6 | 7 | - | 7 | NA | NA | NA |
| 7 | Fathers of school 7 | 6 | - | 6 | NA | NA | NA |
| 8 | Vaccinators (nurses of MTRH) | - | 5 | 5 | NA | NA | NA |
| TOTAL | 30 | 37 | 67 | ||||
agirls targeted for vaccination, approximately 9–14 years old
In total, 10 schools were enrolled in the first phase of the vaccination program. Later the program opened up to the entire community due to low uptake in the initial phase
FGD: focus group discussion; MTRH: Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital; NA: not applicable