Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;46(3):197–211.

Table 4.

Summary of perfusion-related interventions.

Intervention (no. of papers) Type of Study, Surgery Author (year) [reference]1* No.2 Inflammatory Biomarker(S) Suppressed Yes–No: Biomarker3 Clinical Benefit Yes–No: Outcome Modified Comment

Heparin coating (9) RCT, CABG Heyer (2002) [20]4* 265 Yes: C3a6 Yes: cognitive function Significantly improved cognitive dysfunction but no other clinical changes; mild benefit
RCT, CABG Svenmarker (2002) [21] 256 Yes: WBC Yes: neurologic deviation No difference in mortality, ventilator time or ICU stay, but significantly less neurological deviation; mild benefit
RCT, CABG De Vroege (2004) [22] 26 Yes: C3b Yes: pulmonary shunt Decreased pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary shunt; no other clinical changes
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Ueyama (2004) [23] 10 Yes: IL-6, CRP, bradykinin Yes: A-a O2 gradient Two intervention groups: heparin and poly-2-methoxyethyl acrylate (PMEA) coating; both improved the A-a O2 gradient
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Lindholm (2004) [24] 21 Yes: IL-8, NE, C5b-9 No No statistically significant change in ICU or respirator time or inotrope support; no myocardial protection (Tn T)
RCT, CABG Baufreton (2005) [25] 12 Yes: C5b-9 No No statistically significant improvements in prespecified neurological outcomes
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Vanden Eynden (2008) [26] 99 No No No myocardial protection (CK-MB); no change in ICU stay, intubation time, or other hard clinical end points
RCT, CABG Mirow (2011) [27] 21 Yes: TAT No No change in neurological lesions by diffusion-weighted imaging; no change in ICU stay or other clinical outcomes
RCT, CABG Baufreton (2011) [28] 12 Yes: C5b-9 No No statistically significant differences between groups in hard clinical end points
Heparin head-to-head RCT, mixed valve/CABG Hoel (2004) [29] 15 N/A7§ N/A No control group in this heparin head-to-head trial; no difference in inflammatory markers or clinical outcomes
Poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (4) RCT, mixed valve/CABG Ueyama (2004) [23] 10 Yes: IL-6, CRP, bradykinin Yes: A-a O2 gradient Two intervention groups: heparin and PMEA coating; both improved the A-a O2 gradient significantly
RCT, CABG Skrabal (2006) [30] 19 Yes: NE Yes: neurocognitive function Significant improvement in neurocognitive function (Go/NoGo and Mini-Mental-test); Nn change in ICU stay; mild benefit
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Ninomiya (2003) [31] 11 Yes: C3a, NE No No improvement in ICU stay or intubation time; no clinical benefit
RCT, CABG Thiara (2011) [32] 15 No No No benefit of PMEA over phosphorylcholine as control; no difference in ICU stay
Amphophilic silicone-caprolactone oligomer (1) RCT, CABG Allen (2005) [33] 20 Yes: IL-10 No No difference between groups in creatinine, urea, or N-acetyl glucosamine; no change in intubation time or ICU stay
Minimized extracorporeal circuit (8) RCT, CABG Kofidis (2008) [34] 50 Yes: IL-8 Yes: ventilator time, cTnI Improved myocardial protection (Tn I) and ventilator time in minigroup
RCT, CABG Gunaydin (2009) [35] 20 Yes: IL-6, C3a, CD11b Yes: ICU, O2sat. cerebral, CK-MB Significantly improved ICU stay, myocardial protection (CK-MB), cerebral oxygen saturation, and intubation time
RCT, CABG Rimpilainen (2011) [36] 18 Yes: IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, NE, C3a Yes: ICU stay, cerebral emboli Significantly decreased ICU time and microemboli by retinal fluorography in minigroup
RCT, valve Tanaka (2003) [37] 9 No No Closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit does not improve any prespecified clinical endpoints in this small study

Intervention (no. of papers) Type of Study, Surgery Author (year) [reference]8* No.9 Inflammatory Biomarker(S) Suppressed Yes–No: Biomarker10 Clinical Benefit Yes–No: Outcome Modified Comment

RCT, CABG Abdel-Rahman (2005) [38] 101 Yes: NE, C5b-9 No No change in ICU duration or other clinical end points in mini-group
RCT, CABG Rex (2006) [39] 15 No No No improvement in myocardial injury marker (Tn T) in minigroup
RCT, CABG Huybregts (2007) [40] 25 Yes: IL-6, thromboxane B2 No No statistically significant improvements in ICU stay or prespecified clinical end points
RCT, CABG Ohata (2008) [41] 34 Yes: IL-8, NE No No change in any reported clinical outcomes
Leukocyte-depleting filter (8) RCT, CABG Alexiou (2004) [42] 25 Yes: WBC, oxidative burst Yes: A-a O2 gradient Arterial line leuko-depleting filter; improved A-a O2 gradient; no other clinical changes; mild benefit
RCT, CABG Gunaydin (2009) [43] 10 Yes: IL-6, C3a, CD11b Yes: CK-MB Dual filter approach (continuous and after x-clamp) provided significant myocardial protection (CK-MB)
RCT, valve Zhang (2010) [44] 26 No No Arterial line filter improved myocardial protection and respiratory index but increased inflammatory cytokines
RCT, valve Hayashi (2003) [45] 10 Yes: NE, oxidative stress No Cardioplegia leukocyte-depleting filter placed after oxygenator reservoir did not change clinical outcomes
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Chen (2004) [46] 16 Yes: IL-8, sP-sel., sICAM, ox. stress No Arterial line filter did not improve prespecified clinical endpoints
RCT, valve/CABG Koskenkari (2006) [47] 10 No No Arterial line filter did not improve ICU stay or clinical end points; neutrophil activation noted in filter group
RCT, valve/CABG Soo (2010) [48] 20 No No Arterial line filter did not improve ICU stay or clinical end points; leukocyte activation noted in filter group
RCT, CABG Rubino (2011) [49] 41 No No Continuous arterial line plus cardioplegia filters did not improve myocardial markers or ICU stay
Ultrafiltration (3) RCT, CABG Tallman (2002) [50] 15 No No Zero balance ultrafiltration; no change ventilator or ICU time; paradoxical rise in plasma inflammatory markers
RCT, mixed valve/CABG Oliver (2004) [51] 62 No No Ultrafiltration; no clinical benefit in pulmonary function or other prespecified outcomes
RCT, CABG Torina (2010) [52] 20 No No Modified ultrafiltration demonstrated no change in A-a O2 gradient; no benefit
Pericardial blood processing (1) RCT, CABG Marcheix (2008) [53] 25 No No Blood processing with cell saving device did not significantly improve ICU length of stay or other hard clinical end points
Discard mediastinal blood (1) RCT, CABG Westerberg (2004) [54] 17 Yes: IL-8, TNFα No Discarding mediastinal and cardiotomy suction blood had no effect on adverse events or myocardial marker (TnT)
*

Number in square bracket refers to reference number in the Appendix B.

N, number of subjects in treatment group.

Abbreviations used: RCT, randomized controlled trial; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; WBC, white blood cell count; IL, interleukin; CRP, C-reactive protein; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; NE, neutrophil elastase; TAT, thrombin antithrombin; sP-sel., soluble P-selectin; sICAM, soluble ICAM-1; A-a O2, arterial–alveolar oxygen gradient; CK-MB, creatine kinase MB fraction; cTn, cardiac-specific troponin.

§

N/A, not appropriate.