Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;58(4):565–599. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622

Table 4 . Summary of future directions for research and practice.

  Implications
Issue Theory Practice
Defining what is meant by a STS approach to safety Identifying the core constructs and elements of STS, and applying this to safety are often difficult STS means many things to different people and this can sometimes be confusing, especially for safety practitioners
  It is difficult to pin down how the various theoretical traditions which make up STS relate to one another ‘Navigating’ through the vast range of methods is often difficult for non-experts
  Many of the most established constructs within STS (e.g. optimisation, redundancy) need to be reappraised in the light of more recent theory  
The coverage of STS and its application to safety Current methods do not address external and environmental aspect of the work domain (e.g. regulatory, economic influences on safety) A narrow range of causal factors may be used to explain the nature of accidents and human error
  The boundaries between system elements are often blurred or insufficiently defined  
The usability of current methods There is not enough support in current methods to analyse interactions across system levels Interventions which are designed on the basis on using a method may be unsuccessful, since safety may involve a number of system levels and the interaction between these
Methods reliability and validity   Many methods prove to be difficult to use, time consuming and require a lot of training
    Few methods describe details covering their reliability and validity