TABLE AI.
Five-year Lagged Results for Exposure-related Variables, Using Quintile Cutpoints for Each Metrica
| Analysis description | N cases | PY | SIR | 95% CI on SIR | SRR | 95% CI on SRR | Trend slope (SE), P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absorbed dose (mGy) | 2.35E-05b(9.09E-06), 0.0097 | ||||||
| 0 to <1.79 | 68 | 48,701 | 1.37 | 1.07, 1.74 | 1.0 | — | |
| 1.79 to <4.04 | 70 | 35,688 | 1.33 | 1.04, 1.68 | 0.98 | 0.68, 1.41 | |
| 4.04 to <8.12 | 67 | 31,901 | 1.45 | 1.12, 1.84 | 1.04 | 0.72, 1.49 | |
| 8.12 to <16.0 | 70 | 28,710 | 1.37 | 1.07, 1.73 | 1.08 | 0.75, 1.56 | |
| 16.0+ | 68 | 17,477 | 1.34 | 1.04, 1.70 | 1.54 | 0.57, 4.13 | |
| SSI travel (hours) | −8.02E-08 (1.04E-07), 0.44 | ||||||
| 0 to <395 | 68 | 56,625 | 1.15 | 0.89, 1.46 | 1.0 | ||
| 395 to <873 | 69 | 31,394 | 1.52 | 1.18, 1.92 | 1.30 | 0.92, 1.86 | |
| 873 to <1585 | 69 | 26,247 | 1.76 | 1.37, 2.23 | 1.52 | 1.06, 2.17 | |
| 1585 to <2996 | 69 | 28,588 | 1.30 | 1.01, 1.64 | 1.26 | 0.88, 1.80 | |
| 2996+ | 68 | 19,623 | 1.28 | 0.99, 1.62 | 0.95 | 0.67, 1.35 | |
| Time zones crossed (n) | −2.88E-08 (2.41E-08), 0.23 | ||||||
| 0 to <933.9 | 69 | 52,838 | 1.21 | 0.94, 1.54 | 1.0 | — | |
| 933.9 to <1902 | 69 | 30,270 | 1.56 | 1.22, 1.98 | 1.24 | 0.86, 1.77 | |
| 1902 to <3740 | 68 | 31,195 | 1.51 | 1.17, 1.92 | 1.22 | 0.85, 1.76 | |
| 3740 to <7998 | 70 | 31,619 | 1.23 | 0.96, 1.56 | 1.16 | 0.80, 1.68 | |
| 7998+ | 67 | 16,555 | 1.41 | 1.09, 1.79 | 0.94 | 0.65, 1.36 | |
| Empl. duration (days) | −3.70E-08 (1.88E-08)b, 0.049 | ||||||
| 0 to <853 | 68 | 51,313 | 1.37 | 1.06, 1.74 | 1.0 | ||
| 853 to <1829 | 69 | 36,417 | 1.30 | 1.01, 1.65 | 0.97 | 0.68, 1.39 | |
| 1829 to <3229 | 68 | 29,256 | 1.52 | 1.18, 1.93 | 1.13 | 0.79, 1.61 | |
| 3229 to <6659 | 71 | 31,797 | 1.20 | 0.93, 1.51 | 0.97 | 0.67, 1.38 | |
| 6659+ | 67 | 13,694 | 1.54 | 1.19, 1.95 | 0.85 | 0.60, 1.22 |
PY, person-years at risk; SIR, standardized incidence ratio; CI, confidence interval; SRR, standardized rate ratio; SE, standard error; SSI, standard sleep interval.
The date of diagnosis was changed for one subject to reduce the influence of a single cell with one event and little person-time.
Note that this significant slope appears to be a result of a single influential cell and is highly susceptible to cutpoint choice.