Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;4(9):1448–1459. doi: 10.1002/cam4.487

Table 2.

Associations between sirolimus use and risk of specific cancer types

Cancer type Number of studies Cancer events Results by study type1 P-value for heterogeneity between study types Combined results1
Sirolimus group Comparison group Pooled incidence rate ratio (95% CI) P-value Pooled incidence rate ratio (95% CI) P-value
Nonmelanoma skin cancer 15 RCT 912 1412 0.49 (0.32–0.76) <0.001 0.49 (0.32–0.76) <0.001
0 OS
All other cancers 17 RCTs 79 59 1.09 (0.62–1.91) 0.762 0.486 1.06 (0.69–1.63) 0.780
1 OS 85 787 0.94 (0.74–1.19) 0.603
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 9 RCT 23 6 1.78 (0.74–4.31) 0.200 0.178 1.13 (0.63–2.03) 0.682
1 OS 7 73 0.79 (0.36–1.73) 0.556
Kidney 8 RCT 2 15 0.19 (0.01–2.66) 0.220 0.243 0.31 (0.08–1.23) 0.096
1 OS 9 113 0.50 (0.23–1.09) 0.081
Lung 8 RCT 13 2 3.69 (0.51–26.94) 0.198 0.027 1.41 (0.21–9.54) 0.723
1 OS 4 80 0.46 (0.17–1.26) 0.130
Prostate 8 RCT 11 3 1.92 (0.24–15.12) 0.536 0.939 1.84 (0.97–3.49) 0.061
1 OS 21 87 1.86 (1.15–3.01) 0.012
Kaposi sarcoma 5 RCT 0 8 0.03 (0.00–14.03) 0.258 0.190 0.71 (0.02–26.91) 0.852
1 OS 2 7 2.04 (0.40–10.35) 0.390

RCT, randomized controlled trial; OS, observational study.

1

Random effects models were used for pooled incidence rate ratio estimates.

2

These totals do not include events from Hoogendijk-van der Akker et al. This study did not report total cancer counts in each treatment arm, but did report the hazard ratio relating sirolimus and nonmelanoma skin cancer risk, which was used in the pooled incidence rate ratio estimation.