Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;174:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.05.009

Table 2.

Results of FlowFFF analysis: Fe concentration and pH of the samples, Fe and UV–Vis recovery from the FlowFFF analysis, and molar mass (MM) at the mode (peak maximum) of the Fe signala.

Feb
[μmol L− 1]
DOC
[μmol L− 1]
pH Recovery UV–Vis
%
Recovery Fe
%
MMc
[g mol− 1]
Peat-bog draining creek
CB_0 87.9 ± 4.5 12,060 ± 600 5.9 84 93 3320 ± 100
CB_1 22.1 ± 1.1 2450 ± 120 5.3 46 102 2420 ± 90
CB_2 29.0 ± 1.4 3730 ± 260 6.5 38 101 2810 ± 100



Suwannee River NOM
SR_0 17.5 ± 0.9 2500 ± 130 5.5 82 105 3450 ± 110
SR_1 19.5 ± 0.9 2090 ± 100 5.2 60 100 2120 ± 100
SR_2 17.3 ± 0.9 1900 ± 100 4.5 51 108 2580 ± 90
a

Shown in Fig. 3.

b

From ICP-MS bulk measurement.

c

± denotes the confidence interval (P = 0.99).