Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 17;2(1):e000107. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000107

TABLE 2:

Laboratory results and performance divided on training yards

TY 1 TY 2 TY 3 TY 4 Sum
Horses (n) 36 10 14 3 63
Horses excluded (n) 1 0 2 0 3
Horses added (n) 0 0 2 0 2
Sampling occasions* (n) 314 110 126 34 584
Additional sampling occasions† (n) 20 3 0 1 24
Horses with additional sampling occasions (n) 16 3 0 1 20
Sampling occasions (%)
max: horse×13
67 83 69 100
Horses without missing sampling occasions (%) 0 20 0 100
Positive PCR
ERBV (n)
5 0 0 0 5
Positive PCR
EHV-4 (n)
0 1 1 0 2
Titres above cut-off ERBV (n) 67 23 17 26 133
Titres above cut-off ERAV (n) 32 12 27 7 79
Titres above cut-off EHV-1, EHV-4 (n) 44 18 2 0 64
Fourfold rise titre
ERBV (n)
3 3 2 0 8
Fourfold rise titre
ERAV (n)
3 0 0 0 3
Fourfold rise titre
EHV-1, EHV-4 (n)
1 8 1 0 10
Poor performance, total (n) 54 23 15 4 96‡
Poor performance, SFE (n) 21 8 14 2 45
Poor performance,
according to trainer (n)
33 16 1 2 52
SAA above threshold (n) 7 0 3 0 10

*The number of sampling occasions that were based on the regular monthly visits

†Additional sampling occasions due to events of poor performance and/or clinical respiratory signs, occurring outside regular sampling occasions

‡The 96 sampling occasions with poor performance included 52 which were based on trainers’ reports and 45 based on SFEs and 1 horse in which trainers’ report and SFE coincided

EHV, equine herpesvirus; ERAV, equine rhinitis A virus; ERBV, equine rhinitis B virus; n, number; SAA, serum amyloid A; SFE, standardised field exercise test; TY, training yard