Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr 18;24(10):2305–2318. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0987-6

Table 3.

Comparison of Linking Methods

Correlation Mean Difference Standard Deviation of Difference Root Mean Squared Deviation
        BPI-PI to PROMIS-PI
IRT pattern scoring 0.904 −0.012 4.014 4.014
IRT crosswalk 0.904 0.188 4.007 4.012
EQP raw-scale SM=0.0 0.902 0.271 4.120 4.129
EQP raw-scale SM=0.3 0.903 0.173 4.093 4.096
EQP raw-scale SM=1.0 0.904 0.120 4.039 4.041
        SF36-BP to PROMIS-PI
IRT pattern scoring 0.860 −0.165 4.667 4.668
IRT crosswalk 0.852 −0.132 4.785 4.787
EQP raw-scale SM=0.0 0.850 −0.095 4.860 4.861
EQP raw-scale SM=0.3 0.840 0.720 5.445 5.492
EQP raw-scale SM=1.0 0.836 0.958 5.678 5.759

BPI-PI = Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference; PROMIS-PI = Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Scale; SF36-BP = Short Form-36 Bodily Pain; IRT = item response theory; EAP=Expected a priori; EQP = equipercentile