Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 May 2;28(9):1114–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.04.001

Table 2.

Results of multivariable regression models (beta coefficients) with each common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) variable as a separate outcome and the Framingham risk factors as predictors.

Mean near wall IMT* Mean far wall IMT* Mean of near and far wall IMT*
Value p-value Value p-value Value p-value
Age (years) 0.007 < 0.001 0.007 < 0.001 0.007 < 0.001
Sex (men) 0.030 < 0.001 0.045 < 0.001 0.038 < 0.001
Race-Ethnicity
 White (referent)
 Chinese −0.044 < 0.001 −0.021 0.004 −0.033 < 0.001
 African American 0.055 < 0.001 0.024 < 0.001 0.039 < 0.001
 Hispanic −0.002 0.69 −0.008 0.19 −0.006 0.25
Diabetes (yes) 0.036 < 0.001 0.034 < 0.001 0.035 < 0.001
Smoker (yes) 0.011 0.07 0.0003 0.97 0.006 0.30
Systolic Pressure 0.134 < 0.001 0.161 < 0.001 0.170 < 0.001
HDL cholesterol −0.075 < 0.001 −0.084 < 0.001 −0.090 < 0.001
Total cholesterol 0.037 < 0.001 0.055 < 0.001 0.054 < 0.001
Model goodness-of-fit (R2) 0.26 < 0.0001 0.22 < 0.0001 0.31 < 0.0001
*

intima-media thickness

standardized values for coefficients: units of 21.5 mmHg for systolic pressure, 35.6 mg/dL for total cholesterol and 14.8 mg/dL for HDL cholesterol