Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jul 9;30(5):e47–e62. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.05.019

Table 2.

Study Description and Characteristics

# Author/Year Location of Study Study Design and Methods Purpose/Aims Sample (size, description) Quality Level of Evidence
1a Allen, Channon, Lowes, Atwell, & Lane, 2011 United
Kingdom
Qualitative; longitudinal
qualitative case studies, semi-
structured interviews;
recruited from 5 different
diabetes services throughout
the UK
To explore young adults’ and
caregivers’ experiences during
transition from child to adult
diabetes services
Adolescents ages 14-22 with
T1D (n=46), & mothers
(n=39).
10 C
2a Allen et al., 2012 England Mixed methods; semi-
structured interviews, selected
observation, case studies &
surveys; recruited from the
diabetes services in England
To identify the mechanisms of a
smooth transition to adult diabetes
care and the service components
through which these can be
achieved
Interviews of health care
professionals (n=38), young
adults (n=46), and caregivers
(n=39); surveys of young
adults (n=82).
10 C
3 Begley, 2013 Ireland Mixed-methods; surveys with
closed and open-ended
questions; surveys sent to all
known consultants, MDs,
CNS's, and APN's
To clarify how the transition from
childhood to adult healthcare is
managed in young people with
cystic fibrosis (CF) and T1D
Consultants, MDs, CNS's,
and APN's caring for teens
with CF and T1D; (n=71;
54% response rate)
8 C
4 Busse et al., 2007 Germany Quantitative; cross-sectional
structured survey administered
through phone interview;
Sample eligibility criteria: at
least 18 years of age, at least 6
months had elapsed after
transition and the patient had
no other chronic disorder apart
from diabetes
To determine the patients’
perception of transfer
arrangements and to analyze
health care use and metabolic
control
Cases identified through
diabetes registry of the Clinic
and Policlinic for Children
and Adolescents, University
of Leipzig, Germany; (n=101)
10 C
5 Cadario et al., 2009 Italy Quantitative; retrospective
cohort study; comparison
group of PDS patients
discharged with an
unstructured transfer;
exposure group discharged
with structured transition
To investigate the outcomes of a
structured transition program to
an unstructured one
Adolescents and young adults
(n=62) discharged from the
pediatric diabetes service
(PDS) to the adult pediatric
service (ADS)
9 C
6 de Beaufort, Jarosz-Chobot, Frank, de Bart, & Deja, 2010 International Quantitative; cross-sectional
questionnaire
To evaluate the practices of
diabetes health care providers
concerning the transition from
pediatric to adult diabetes care
Email with survey link sent to
all members of the
International Society for
Pediatric and Adolescent
Diabetes (n=92; 16%
response rate)
9 C
7b Dovey-Pearce, Doherty, & May, 2007 England Qualitative; thematic analysis
of audio recorded interviews;
recruited from young adults
served by specialist diabetes
services
To describe and understand the
influence of diabetes upon
psychosocial development and to
highlight the implications for
healthcare teams.
16-25 year olds with T1D
(n=19); 8 males; 11 females
10 C
8b Dovey-Pearce, Hurrell, May, Walker, & Doherty, 2005 England Qualitative; semi-structured
interviews and focus groups;
recruited from young adults
served by specialist diabetes
services
To understand the opinions of
young adults with diabetes who
were receiving secondary care
services about the provision of
diabetes services
16-25 year olds with T1D
(n=19); 8 males; 11 females
10 C
9c Garvey et al., 2014 United
States of
America
Qualitative; focus group
interviews; recruited from
emerging adults receiving
adult diabetes care at a single
center
To explore the experience of
transition from pediatric to adult
diabetes care reported by post-
transition emerging adults with
T1D
Young adults with T1D, 22-
30 years old, diagnosed with
diabetes at ≤18 years of age
(n=26)
8 C
10 Garvey et al., 2013 United
States of
America
Quantitative; cross-sectional
survey; recruited from
emerging adults with T1D
who had been previously
followed in the pediatric
diabetes clinic at Boston
Children's hospital
To describe the current status of
adult diabetes care in young
adults with T1D and examine
associations between health care
transition experiences and care
utilization
205 surveys sent to sample,
65 returned (32% response
rate)
9 C
11 Garvey et al., 2012 United
States of
America
Quantitative; cross-sectional
survey; recruited from
emerging adults with T1D
aged 22-30 years, under the
care of any adult diabetes
specialist at the Joslin
Diabetes Center
To examine characteristics of the
transition from pediatric to adult
care in emerging adults with T1D
and evaluate associations between
transition characteristics and
glycemic control
484 mailed surveys, 258
collected (53% response rate)
10 C
12 Gerber, Solomon, Shaffer, Quinn, & Lipton, 2007 United
States of
America
Quantitative; cohort study; no
control; one intervention
group followed; sample
eligibility criteria: fluent in
English, diagnosed with
diabetes prior to 18th birthday,
over 18 years of age at time of
recruitment
To evaluate the effectiveness of
an internet-based transition
support program, STYLE, in an
urban cohort of individuals
between 19-26 years of age
19 participants given
intervention, only 12 attended
feedback sessions for analysis
4 C
13 Hanna et al., 2013 United
States of
America
Quantitative; longitudinal
study; pre-post test design;
three consecutive years of
recruiting students with T1D
in their last 6 months of high
school
To examine: (1) how diabetes
care responsibility changed in
relation to time and living
situation and (2) the association of
diabetes self-efficacy, gender and
glycemic control with changes in
diabetes care responsibility
n = 113 (17-19 year olds with
T1D);
10 B
14 Helgeson et al., 2013 United
States of
America
Quantitative; questionnaire
with repeated samples; time 1
during senior year of high
school; time 2 one year later;
recruited from a previous
study in the Children's
Hospital of Pittsburgh in
2002-2004
To describe the transition of youth
with T1D from pediatric to adult
healthcare services and examine
the link of this transition with
self- care and glycemic control
and distinguish medical treatment
from different physicians
118 adolescents who utilize
either a pediatric
endocrinologist or adult
physician
10 C
15 Hilliard et al., 2014 United
States of
America
Mixed methods; surveys with
open ended questions; pre-
transition group was recruited
from a pediatric diabetes
clinic; post-transition recruited
from 18-22 year olds who
were treated at the same clinic
To describe the concerns,
expectations, preferences, and
experiences of youth and parents
before and after transitioning from
pediatric to adult care.
Pre-transition: adolescents
aged 15-17 with T1D (n=20)
Post-transition: young adults
aged 18-22 (n=59)
9 C
16 Holmes- Walker, Llewellyn, & Farrell, 2007 Australia Quantitative; simple
interrupted time series design;
young adults aged 15-25 with
T1D were referred to the
program that was based at a
tertiary adult referral hospital
in July 2001
To determine if a transition
support program could maintain
attendance at a specialist clinic,
improve diabetes control, and
reduce acute hospital admissions
in 15-25 year olds with T1D
Patients (n=191) referred
were seen in a young adult
diabetes clinic and did not
routinely meet the transition
coordinator or adult diabetes
specialist
4 B
17 Huang et al., 2014 United
States of
America
Quantitative; randomized
Clinical Trial; recruited from
1 pediatric tertiary care
academic medical center
To evaluate whether a internet-
and mobile phone-delivered
disease management intervention
improves disease management,
self-efficacy, and communication
outcomes
Adolescents (n=81) aged 12-
22 with either inflammatory
bowel disease, cystic fibrosis,
or T1D
7 A
18 Kime, 2013 United
Kingdom
Qualitative; focus groups To report on the transition process
and the role of community nurses
in young peoples’ diabetes care
9 acute trusts across
the region and more than 300
participants, parents, and
professionals
7 C
19 Lotstein et al., 2013 United
States of
America
Quantitative; retrospective
cohort study; utilized
SEARCH for Diabetes in
Youth Study data to find those
who completed at least
1 follow up visit after age 18
Describe sociodemographic and
clinical correlates of poor
glycemic control associated with
transfer of care of youth with T1D
diagnosed in adolescence
185 American adolescents
(ages 13-18) with T1D
10 B
20 Lundin, Ohrn, & Danielson, 2008 Sweden Qualitative; ethnographic
approach with formal and
informal interviews;
participants observed from 2
pediatric diabetes clinics and 2
adult diabetes clinics
Describe care culture in pediatric
and adult diabetes outpatient
clinics and implications for care
of adolescents
Observations of 51
participants; interviews of 10
physicians
9 C
21 Markowitz & Laffel, 2012 United
States of
America
Quantitative; pre-post test
design to evaluate group
support program; interested
patients recruited through
flyers
To examine the effects of a group
support program
15 emerging adults with T1D;
ages 18-30
10 C
22 Nakhla, Daneman, To, Paradis, & Guttmann, 2009 Canada Quantitative; retrospective
cohort study; examined health
administrative and survey data
from Ontario Diabetes
Database
Compare rates of DM related
hospitalization & retinopathy
screening before and after
transition to adult care.
1507 young adults with T1D 10 B
23 Neu et al., 2010 Germany Quantitative; pre-post
questionnaire after transition
to adult care; recruited from a
single hospital
Identify the type of clinical care
received by young T1D patients
who transition to adult care, and
assess the metabolic status of long
term treatment after transition
99 patients (28 drop outs,
28.2%)
average age at transition: 21.8
years
10 C
24 Perry, Steinbeck, Dunbabin, & Lowe, 2010 Australia Quantitative; retrospective
cohort study; case note audits
at 6 diabetes clinics
To document diabetes health
services use and indices
of glycemic management of young
people with T1D
239 young adults with T1D
ages 18-28;
10 C
25 Price et al., 2011 United
Kingdom
Qualitative; semi-structured
interviews; recruited from
adolescents attending a
diabetes clinic
To evaluate the transition pathway
in diabetes using qualitative
methods in order to explore the
experiences and suggestions of
the young people
11 young adults aged 16-18
with T1D
8 C
26c Ritholz et al., 2014 United
States of
America
Qualitative; focus group
interviews; recruited from
emerging adults receiving
adult diabetes care at a single
center
To explore perceptions emerging
adults with T1D have of their
patient-provider relationships
across the transition from
pediatric to adult care
Young adults with T1D, 22-
30 years old, diagnosed with
diabetes at ≤18 years of age
(n=26)
8 C
27 Scott, Vallis, Charette, Murray, & Latta, 2005 Canada Mixed-methods; questionnaire
followed by telephone
interview; invitation letters
were sent to former patients of
a tertiary pediatric diabetes
care center
To understand why young adults
drop out of diabetes care during
transition from pediatric to adult
health care and to obtain
information as how the care could
better meet their needs
76 participants returned
questionnaires (33.3%
response rate); 19 telephone
interviews
7 C
28 van Staa, Jedeloo, van Meeteren, & Latour, 2011 Netherlands Qualitative; semi-structured
interviews on young adult
patients and on their parents
and healthcare providers;
potential participants were
randomly selected from a list
of young adult patients
officially discharged in the
previous 2 years
To examine the expectation and
experience with transfer and
perceived quality of care in
pediatric care and adult services
3 of the 24 randomly selected
participants were diagnosed
with diabetes; aged 15-22;
24 parents; 17 healthcare
providers
8 C
29 Van Walleghem, MacDonald, & Dfan, 2008 Canada Quantitative; 2 year
prospective cohort study with
follow up every 6 months;
data gathered from database
review and audit of medical
records
To report clinical outcomes and
identify barriers to care for young
adults with T1D after transfer
from pediatric to adult care
Two cohorts followed:
Younger group aged 18 years
(n=84) from the “Maestro
Project”
Older group aged 19-25
(n=64) who were transferred
to adult care without the
initial support
6 C
30 Vanelli et al., 2004 Italy Quantitative; 8 year
retrospective cohort study;
data gathered from T1D
patients at a hospital
To report the effects of a protocol
for an uninterrupted procedure to
transfer adolescents with T1D
from pediatric to adult clinic in a
hospital
73 patients with T1D, average
age of 26.5 years (sd=2.6)
8 C
31 Wilson, 2010 United
States of
America
Qualitative; semi-structured
phone interviews;
convenience sample recruited
from colleges and universities
To explore the experiences of
young adults managing T1D at
college or university
23 young adults with T1D;
aged 17-19
6 C
a

indicates studies utilizing same dataset or sample

b

indicates studies utilizing same dataset or sample

c

indicates studies utilizing same dataset or sample