. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar 11;75(2):639–652. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25624

Table 1.

Signal to noise ratios (SNR) and contrast to noise ratios (CNR) of our AMUSE-DWI motion-correction scheme and a SENSE-based motion-correction scheme. Images reconstructed with AMUSE-DWI had both higher SNR and CNR for all experiments.

SNRs and CNRs of AMUSE and SENSE-based Motion Correction
	SNR \| CNR
	Stationary	Hybrid Simulation	Small Motion	Large Motion

AMUSE-DWI Correction	20.00 \| 15.28	23.83 \| 17.32	23.44 \| 18.49	23.57 \| 17.39

SENSE Correction	11.89 \| 10.07	14.78 \| 11.53	14.34 \| 12.84	14.27 \| 11.86

SNRs and CNRs of AMUSE and SENSE-based Motion Correction
	SNR \| CNR
	Stationary	Hybrid Simulation	Small Motion	Large Motion

AMUSE-DWI Correction	20.00 \| 15.28	23.83 \| 17.32	23.44 \| 18.49	23.57 \| 17.39

SENSE Correction	11.89 \| 10.07	14.78 \| 11.53	14.34 \| 12.84	14.27 \| 11.86