Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):e68–e72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000334

Table 3.

Correspondences between Residents’ Minimum Data Set 2.0 Cognitive Performance Scale Scores and their Minimum Data Set 3.0 Brief Interview for Mental Status and Cognitive Performance Scale Scores (n= 688,511).

MDS 3.0 CPS Categories
(n=187,161)
MDS 3.0 BIMS Categories
(n=501,350)
MDS 2.0 CPS Categories Scores
0–2
Intact/Mild
Impairment
Scores
3 & 4
Moderate
Impairment
Scores
5 & 6
Severe
Impairment
Scores
15–13
Intact/
Borderline
Scores
2–8
Moderate
Impairment
Scores
7–0
Severe
Impairment
Scores 0–2
Intact/Mild Impairment
N 14630 4115 2847 143282 78430 42372
Row % 4% 2% 1% 50% 27% 15%
Scores 3 & 4
Moderate Impairment
N 14830 40964 28965 30016 57535 127391
Row % 1% 18% 10% 10% 19% 43%
Scores 5 & 6
Severe Impairment
N 1076 5681 74053 728 2468 19128
Row % 0% 6% 72% 1% 2% 19%

Notes. MDS= Minimum Data Set; CPS= Cognitive Performance Scale; BIMS= Brief Interview of Mental Status