Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;5(9):e008547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008547

Table 2.

E-cigarette displays and shop fascia advertising, 12-month comparison

Wave 1 (n=96) Wave 2 (n=96)
Internal e-cigarette displays
Number of outlets with purpose-designed displays* 20 (21%) 47 (49%)
 Display unit type
  Tower 7 (7%) 29 (30%)
  Tray 1 (1%) 19 (20%)
  Hanger 5 (5%) 3 (3%)
  Other 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  Unspecified 7 (7%) 0 (0%)
 Brand
  Elites 9 (9%) 21 (22%)
  Nicolites 8 (8%) 22 (23%)
  SkyCig 0 (0%) 14 (15%)
  OK 0 (0%) 11 (11%)
  10 Motives 1 (1%) 17 (18%)
  Njoy 0 (0%) 12 (13%)
  VIP 0 (0%) 5 (5%)
  Vype 0 (0%) 4 (4%)
  Vivid 0 (0%) 3 (3%)
  Multicig 0 (0%) 3 (3%)
  Diamond Mist 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  Impulse 1 (1%) 2 (2%)
  i-Breathe 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  Collins 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  Bull 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  Unspecified 1 (1%) 0 (0%)
  Mean number of brands displayed† 0.21 1.50
  SD 0.41 1.31
External advertising for e-cigarette brands
Number of outlets with any e-cigarette ads on shop fascia‡ 10 (10%) 10 (10%)
 Brand advertised
  Elites 8 (8%) 3 (3%)
  SkyCig 1 (1%) 3 (3%)
  VIP 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  OK 0 (0%) 2 (2%)
  A-cigarettes 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
  E-liquid 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
  Collins 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
  Diamond Mist 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
  Starlite 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
Number of e-cigarette ads on shop fascia
 None 86 (90%) 86 (90%)
 One brand 10 (10%) 4 (4%)
 Two brands 0 (0%) 4 (4%)
 Three brands 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
 Four brands 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
 Mean§ 0.10 0.2
 SD 0.31 0.66

*McNemar test for differences waves 1–2: p<0.001.

†Paired t test for differences waves 1–2: p<0.001.

‡McNemar test for differences waves 1–2: not significant, p>0.99.

§Paired t test for differences waves 1–2: not significant, p=0.161.