Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 18;5(17):3704–3724. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1627

Table 2.

Threats to Columbia spotted frog persistence identified by resource managers and summary of findings from this or other studies

Threat category Threat Habitat variables examined Effect on/corr. with spotted frog occupancy Data source/citation
Habitat loss Beaver habitat loss HABITAT negative Fig.3, Table3, Appendix 2
Fragmentation WATERCON, LOTICLENTIC/WATERPERM negative Appendix 5, Hossack et al. (2015), Pilliod et al. (in press)
Grazing GRAZEIMPACT GRAZED negative Appendix 6, Appendix 7, Pilliod and Scherer (2015)
Predation/disease Salmonids FISHSTATUS negative Fig.2, Fig.4, Appendix 8, Appendix 9
Centrarchids FISHSTATUS nd More surveys needed
Bullfrogs Location data na Fig.2, Appendices 9, 10, 11, Pearl et al. (2004); Monello et al. (2006)
Amphibian chytrid fungus Location data na Appendices 10b and 11, Van Horne (2012)
Climate/weather Climate change HYDROPERIOD negative Appendix 12, Pilliod et al. (in press)
Drought HYDROPERIOD negative Appendix 12

na = threat was not examined using data from habitat surveys; occurrences from GIS databases were used instead (see Table1).

nd = none detected during habitat surveys.