Table 2.
Threats to Columbia spotted frog persistence identified by resource managers and summary of findings from this or other studies
| Threat category | Threat | Habitat variables examined | Effect on/corr. with spotted frog occupancy | Data source/citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat loss | Beaver habitat loss | HABITAT | negative | Fig.3, Table3, Appendix 2 |
| Fragmentation | WATERCON, LOTICLENTIC/WATERPERM | negative | Appendix 5, Hossack et al. (2015), Pilliod et al. (in press) | |
| Grazing | GRAZEIMPACT GRAZED | negative | Appendix 6, Appendix 7, Pilliod and Scherer (2015) | |
| Predation/disease | Salmonids | FISHSTATUS | negative | Fig.2, Fig.4, Appendix 8, Appendix 9 |
| Centrarchids | FISHSTATUS | nd | More surveys needed | |
| Bullfrogs | Location data | na | Fig.2, Appendices 9, 10, 11, Pearl et al. (2004); Monello et al. (2006) | |
| Amphibian chytrid fungus | Location data | na | Appendices 10b and 11, Van Horne (2012) | |
| Climate/weather | Climate change | HYDROPERIOD | negative | Appendix 12, Pilliod et al. (in press) |
| Drought | HYDROPERIOD | negative | Appendix 12 |
na = threat was not examined using data from habitat surveys; occurrences from GIS databases were used instead (see Table1).
nd = none detected during habitat surveys.