Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct;39(10):1313–1321. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000469

Table 1. The clinicopathologic features of FOS-rearranged epithelioid hemangioma.

Case Age/Sex Depth Location Multifocal Histologic variant Genetic alterations
1 45/M Bone Rib No Typical LMNA-FOS
2 56/F Bone Foot Yes Cellular VIM-FOS
3 38/F Bone Foot (cuboid) NA Cellular VIM-FOS
4 48/M Cutaneous Penis Yes Typical FOS rearrangement
5 63/M Soft tissue Arm No Cellular FOS rearrangement
6 31/M Bone Foot No Cellular FOS rearrangement
7 38/M Soft tissue Arm No Typical FOS rearrangement
8 23/M Bone Chest wall No Typical FOS rearrangement
9 41/M Bone L5 vertebra No Cellular FOS rearrangement
10 67/M Soft tissue Scalp NA Cellular FOS rearrangement
11 46/F Bone Metatarsal NA Cellular FOS rearrangement
12 45/F Soft tissue Foot NA Cellular FOS rearrangement
13 54/M Soft tissue Arm NA Cellular FOS rearrangement
14 67/F Soft tissue Hand NA Cellular FOS rearrangement
15 15/M Bone Toe No Typical FOS rearrangement
16 15/M Bone Femur No Cellular FOS rearrangement
17 18/M Bone Radius No Cellular FOS rearrangement

NA: not available