Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015 Aug 1;57:232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.027

Table II.

Summary of PCL Matrix Samples Analyzed

Pharmaceutical n % Loading
(w/w API/PCL)
Membrane
Thickness (µm)
D‘ (mm2/hr) Y'
Aspirin 3 3 15.8 1.3E-05 1.38E-10
3 4 17.3 2.4E-05 8.44E-11
3 5 19.5 1.4E-05 6.67E-11
3 5 17.4 1.8E-05 1.65E-10
3 6 20.2 2.2E-05 1.96E-10
Atenolol 3 4 12 1.5E-05 5.93E-11
3 5 10.4 1.0E-05 7.49E-11
3 7 19.5 7.8E-06 9.88E-11
3 7 7.7 1.0E-05 6.52E-11
Caffeine 3 2 8.6 8.2E-06 *
3 3 10.2 7.9E-06 *
3 4 10.4 1.7E-05 *
3 5 19.5 1.3E-05 1.84E-11
3 7 13.2 2.3E-05 1.75E-11
Diclofenac-Na 3 4 19.5 5.3E-06 1.16E-07
Ibuprofen 3 3 16.2 1.0E-05 1.99E-08
3 4 14.7 1.4E-05 1.82E-08
3 5 19.8 1.0E-05 2.87E-08
Labetalol-HCl 3 5 19.5 3.4E-06 3.41E-09
Metoprolol Tartrate 3 16 20.3 3.0E-06 1.82E-10
Ranitidine-HCl 3 9 19.5 2.6E-06 1.54E-10
Verapamil-HCl 3 4 13.7 1.2E-06 6.29E-08
3 6 14.5 1.1E-06 1.01E-07
3 11 13.6 1.2E-06 5.52E-07
3 12 19.2 4.8E-06 2.04E-07
*

Y’ not calculated for these samples. Drug loading was below Cs and data is fit with equation 1b only.