Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun 6;21(10):1783–1789. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.028

Table 3. Multivariable Analysis Comparing outcomes between HLA 8/8 to HLA 7/8 Donors.

Variable RR 95% CI Lower Limit 95% CI Upper Limit p value
aGVHD II-IV
 8/8 allele match 1 0.003
 7/8 allele match 1.29 1.09 1.53
aGVHD III-IV
 8/8 allele match 1 0.05
 7/8 allele match 1.69 1.00 3.36
CGVHD
 8/8 allele match 1 0.15
 7/8 allele match 1.11 0.96 1.28
TRM
 8/8 allele match 1 <.0001
 7/8 allele match 1.52 1.29 1.79
Relapse
 8/8 allele match 1 0.92
 7/8 allele match 1.007 0.87 1.17
DFS
 8/8 allele match 1 0.0015
 7/8 allele match 1.20 1.07 1.34
OS
 8/8 allele match 1 0.0001
 7/8 allele match 1.25 1.12 1.40

Multivariable mo dels also included the following c ovariates: aGV HD II-IV: G VHD prophylaxis, graft type, in vivo T cell depletion, DPB1 matching; aGVHD III-IV: GVHD prophylaxis, TBI, in vivo T cell depletion; cGVHD: year of transplant, in vivo T cell depletion; TRM: graft type, recipient age, Karnofsky performance score, disease, GVHD prophylaxis; Relapse: Karnofsky performance score, disease status, conditioning intensity, in vivo T cell depletion; DFS: Karnofsky performance score, disease status, conditioning intensity; OS: graft type, recipient age, Karnofsky performance score, donor age, and disease status.