Diaco et al[42] |
Preperitoneal approach (n = 96) |
Return to active participation within 3-6 wk in 92/96 patients |
- |
Edelman et al[43] |
Preperitoneal approach (n = 10) |
Return to full activity within 4 wk in 9/10 patients |
None |
Ingoldby[44] |
Laparoscopic vs conventional (n = 14 each) |
Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to training in 4 wk (13/14 vs 9/14), resume full contact (3 wk vs 5 wk; P < 0.05) |
Conventional: hernia, n = 1 after 22 mo; laparoscopic: pain, n = 1 after 5 mo |
Susmallian et al[10] |
Preperitoneal approach (n = 35) |
Return to full activity in 34/35 patients |
- |
Srinivasan et al[45] |
Extraperitoneal approach (n = 15) |
Return to full activity within 4 wk in 13/15 patients |
None |
Genitsaris et al[46] |
Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 131) |
100% of patients returned to full activity within 2-3 wk |
Pain, n = 4; hernia, n = 1 after 7 yr |
Paajanen et al[47] |
Extraperitoneal approach vs conventional treatment (n = 30 each) |
Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to full activity within 3 mo (27/30 vs 8/30) |
- |
Paajanen et al[48] |
Extraperitoneal approach (n = 41) |
Return to full activity within 4 wk in 39/41 patients |
- |
van Veen et al[49] |
Extraperitoneal approach (n = 55) |
100% of patients returned to full activity within 3 mo |
- |
Kluin et al[4] |
Preperitoneal approach (n = 17) |
Return to full activity within 3 mo in 13/17 patients |
Minor symptoms, n = 2 after 1 yr |
Ziprin et al[50] |
Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 17) |
Return to full activity in 16/17 patients within a median of 42 d |
Mild pain, n = 5 |