Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;3(9):823–830. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i9.823

Table 2.

Laparoscopic mesh repair treatment for sports hernias

Ref. Treatment Results Recurrence
Diaco et al[42] Preperitoneal approach (n = 96) Return to active participation within 3-6 wk in 92/96 patients -
Edelman et al[43] Preperitoneal approach (n = 10) Return to full activity within 4 wk in 9/10 patients None
Ingoldby[44] Laparoscopic vs conventional (n = 14 each) Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to training in 4 wk (13/14 vs 9/14), resume full contact (3 wk vs 5 wk; P < 0.05) Conventional: hernia, n = 1 after 22 mo; laparoscopic: pain, n = 1 after 5 mo
Susmallian et al[10] Preperitoneal approach (n = 35) Return to full activity in 34/35 patients -
Srinivasan et al[45] Extraperitoneal approach (n = 15) Return to full activity within 4 wk in 13/15 patients None
Genitsaris et al[46] Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 131) 100% of patients returned to full activity within 2-3 wk Pain, n = 4; hernia, n = 1 after 7 yr
Paajanen et al[47] Extraperitoneal approach vs conventional treatment (n = 30 each) Laparoscopic treatment superior: return to full activity within 3 mo (27/30 vs 8/30) -
Paajanen et al[48] Extraperitoneal approach (n = 41) Return to full activity within 4 wk in 39/41 patients -
van Veen et al[49] Extraperitoneal approach (n = 55) 100% of patients returned to full activity within 3 mo -
Kluin et al[4] Preperitoneal approach (n = 17) Return to full activity within 3 mo in 13/17 patients Minor symptoms, n = 2 after 1 yr
Ziprin et al[50] Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (n = 17) Return to full activity in 16/17 patients within a median of 42 d Mild pain, n = 5