Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 14;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13062-015-0080-7

Table 3.

Divergence analysis for GGT subfamilies: Divergence type I and type II analyses of two clusters comparisons are shown here in details

Bacteria 1/Bacteria 4-Extremophile Bacteria 1/Eukaryote
FD I FD II FD I FD II
θ I = 0.49 ± 0.08 θ II =0.31 ± 0.09 θ I = 0.58 ± 0.12 θ II = 0.31 ± 0.08
P = 0.75 R = 9.50 P = 0.70 R = 10.35
Site E c B h Site E c B h Site E c Hm Site E c Hm
G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1 G 1
415 P291 P268 215 R114 S88 544 V396 V386 540 T392 A382
463 A335 V309 540 T392 V359 546 D398 A388 631 S481 A471
465 R337 G311 541 H393 Y360 629 T479 V367 638 I488 T478
474 F346 D320 555 T407 I374 632 P482 A472
478 D350 S319 559 N411 Y378 641 V491 T481
535 E387 P354 611 S462 I422 725 I556 I547
576 N428 Q395 631 S481 V438 758 E563 G553
583 S435 S402 632 P482 M439
602 A453 A410 637 I487 Q444
638 I488 P445
G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2 G 2
264 Y161 Y133 184 A84 T59 163 I65 A57 184 A84 G76
275 V170 L142 187 H87 T64 287 I182 P169 187 H87 N79
276 Q171 A143 190 A90 N66 342 L231 Y217 188 P88 A80
287 I182 P154 196 G95 D71 383 A269 N255 190 A90 S82
349 G238 N215 213 D112 N86 409 Y285 V272 191 G91 M83
351 D240 E217 216 E115 G89 491 K361 A352 197 G97 L89
398 R283 R260 338 L227 A205 647 N497 Y487 213 D112 N105
409 Y285 Y262 389 R275 V252 687 D532 A522 249 G147 A133
432 E308 K284 543 S395 A362 719 G551 A542 261 L158 H145
440 G316 D292 579 M431 G398 264 Y161 H148
486 N356 S330 641 S465 H419 266 T163 R150
487 K357 D331 665 H515 Q472 278 A173 S160
489 Y359 Y333 316 K206 C192
545 V397 A364 362 A248 T234
550 N402 N369 389 R275 I261
624 K474 Q431 395 G280 I267
649 I499 I456 398 R283 G270
675 D521 K477 408 G284 D271
687 D532 D488 414 M290 P277
759 L564 L524 418 P292 A279
416 S294 L281
423 H299 V285
432 E308 K294
464 D336 K326
487 K357 E348
585 K437 P427
608 R459 Q448
643 Q493 L483
650 D500 W490
675 D521 N511
761 G566 A556

θI and θII >0 are observed for type I and type II analysis respectively in each case. Corresponding residues are marked on the two representative proteins of the compared clusters with respect to predicted divergence sites by FDI and FDII methods. Divergence sites predicted through the analysis are divided into two groups, G1 and G2, where G1 represents the sites that are close to the known functional residues forming the substrate binding cavity and G2 represents all other sites.  Ec: gamma glutamyl transpeptidase of Escherichia coli. Bh: Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase of Bacillus halodurans. Hm: gamma glutamyl transpeptidase of human