Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;112(36):11175–11180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509228112

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Stability of creased spherical shells (K > 0). (A) For an uncreased shell, the energy of an indented shell is composed of the bending energy EB (black dotted) and the Pogorelov ridge EP (colored dotted). For a creased shell EP takes a substantial dip localized at rRt, but the total energy ET (colored solid) only has a local minimum if the crease is large enough. In these schematics the function t(r) is chosen to mimic the profile provided by experimental molds. (B) Numerically calculated energy landscape for a creased shell with γ104 for a variety of α. The Pogorelov solution is recovered for α=0 (red plot), whereas for small values of α the energy gain from the crease is insufficient to create a local minimum. However, above a critical α, local minima (solid green) and maxima (dashed green) bifurcate to generate a region of stability. (C) Phase diagram for snapping behavior of spherical shells over a wide range of geometrical parameters α and 1/γ. Stability behavior in experiments is characterized as bistable (Inline graphic, switches to folded state through a snapping mechanism), monostable (Inline graphic, prefers unfolded state), or temporarily stable (Inline graphic, closer to phase boundary: snap back on a timescale of seconds without external perturbations). Finite-element simulations (points solved denoted with +) provide regions of monostability (red shading) and bistability (green shading). Each experimental data point was analyzed for at least three shells of appropriate parameters.