Table 4.
Bias and precision of nilotinib oral clearance at the population level and individual level, between-individual variability, and between-occasion variability
| Between-occasion variability | Number of patients in trial | Oral Clearance – Population level | Oral Clearance – Individual level | Between-individual variability | Between-occasion variability | Food effect | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bias | Precision | Bias | Precision | Bias | Precision | Bias | Precision | Bias | Precision | ||
| 10% | 20 | −11.8% | 16.0% | −0.6% | 4.6% | −9.0% | 18.1% | −3.9% | 11.0% | −0.12% | 12.3% |
| 50 | −12.0% | 16.3% | −0.5% | 4.3% | −9.9% | 13.4% | −2.1% | 6.9% | −0.05% | 12.3% | |
| 70 | −12.8% | 14.2% | −0.5% | 4.2% | −8.0% | 11.3% | −2.3% | 5.7% | −0.04% | 6.3% | |
| 25% | 20 | −12.0% | 16.2% | −1.5% | 6.6% | −8.8% | 18.5% | −1.9% | 8.9% | −0.4% | 30% |
| 50 | −12.4% | 16.7% | −1.0% | 6% | −9.1% | 13.1% | −1.2% | 5.2% | 0.9% | 20.9% | |
| 70 | −13.3% | 14.7% | −0.8% | 5.7% | −7.9% | 11.7% | −0.9% | 4.9% | −1.39% | 15.5% | |
| 40% | 20 | −12% | 16.4% | −1.9% | 8.6% | −8.5% | 19.4% | −1.8% | 8.7% | 11.8% | 38.8% |
| 50 | −12.7% | 17.0% | −1.0% | 7.2% | −9.2% | 13.9% | −0.4% | 7.7% | 2.32% | 30% | |
| 70 | −13.3% | 14.7% | −0.9% | 7.1% | −7.9% | 12.3% | −0.7% | 4.9% | −2.16% | 24.3% | |