Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Feb 4;55(5):556–562. doi: 10.1002/jcph.449

Table 4.

Bias and precision of nilotinib oral clearance at the population level and individual level, between-individual variability, and between-occasion variability

Between-occasion variability Number of patients in trial Oral Clearance – Population level Oral Clearance – Individual level Between-individual variability Between-occasion variability Food effect
Bias Precision Bias Precision Bias Precision Bias Precision Bias Precision
10% 20 −11.8% 16.0% −0.6% 4.6% −9.0% 18.1% −3.9% 11.0% −0.12% 12.3%
50 −12.0% 16.3% −0.5% 4.3% −9.9% 13.4% −2.1% 6.9% −0.05% 12.3%
70 −12.8% 14.2% −0.5% 4.2% −8.0% 11.3% −2.3% 5.7% −0.04% 6.3%
25% 20 −12.0% 16.2% −1.5% 6.6% −8.8% 18.5% −1.9% 8.9% −0.4% 30%
50 −12.4% 16.7% −1.0% 6% −9.1% 13.1% −1.2% 5.2% 0.9% 20.9%
70 −13.3% 14.7% −0.8% 5.7% −7.9% 11.7% −0.9% 4.9% −1.39% 15.5%
40% 20 −12% 16.4% −1.9% 8.6% −8.5% 19.4% −1.8% 8.7% 11.8% 38.8%
50 −12.7% 17.0% −1.0% 7.2% −9.2% 13.9% −0.4% 7.7% 2.32% 30%
70 −13.3% 14.7% −0.9% 7.1% −7.9% 12.3% −0.7% 4.9% −2.16% 24.3%