Table 11. A Comparison of Key Bond Lengths (Å) and Angles (deg) between the ROH- and η2-ring Structures in Both the Oxidized and 1e– Reduced ROHP–EH States.
oxidized |
reduced |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
binding mode | ROH | ROH | η2-ring |
η2-ring |
||
valence isomer | αββα | βααβ | αββα | βααβ | αββα | βααβ |
cluster bond lengths | ||||||
Fe1–S5 | 2.200 | 2.200 | 2.197 | 2.197 | 2.207 | 2.285 |
Fe1–S6 | 2.282 | 2.282 | 2.277 | 2.278 | 2.298 | 2.291 |
Fe1–S7 | 2.319 | 2.319 | 2.304 | 2.304 | 2.308 | 2.384 |
Fe2–S5 | 2.328 | 2.328 | 2.305 | 2.304 | 2.302 | 2.316 |
Fe2–S6 | 2.206 | 2.206 | 2.193 | 2.192 | 2.225 | 2.194 |
Fe2–S8 | 2.357 | 2.357 | 2.358 | 2.360 | 2.361 | 2.373 |
Fe3–S5 | 2.305 | 2.305 | 2.300 | 2.300 | 2.285 | 2.311 |
Fe3–S7 | 2.240 | 2.240 | 2.265 | 2.267 | 2.320 | 2.271 |
Fe3–S8 | 2.361 | 2.361 | 2.350 | 2.349 | 2.344 | 2.367 |
Fe4–S6 | 2.326 | 2.326 | 2.309 | 2.310 | 2.318 | 2.312 |
Fe4–S7 | 2.322 | 2.322 | 2.325 | 2.324 | 2.343 | 2.307 |
Fe4–S8 | 2.241 | 2.241 | 2.229 | 2.230 | 2.256 | 2.246 |
Fe2–SC12 | 2.256 | 2.256 | 2.241 | 2.238 | 2.290 | 2.285 |
Fe3–SC197 | 2.275 | 2.275 | 2.285 | 2.284 | 2.281 | 2.364 |
Fe4–SC96 | 2.295 | 2.295 | 2.279 | 2.279 | 2.338 | 2.314 |
HMBPP bond lengths | ||||||
Fe1–OC4 | 2.214 | 2.214 | 4.514 | 4.516 | 4.525 | 4.287 |
Fe1–C3 | 3.531 | 3.531 | 2.603 | 2.604 | 2.552 | 2.144 |
Fe1–C2 | 3.272 | 3.272 | 2.571 | 2.569 | 2.485 | 2.118 |
H-bond lengths | ||||||
OC4–OT167 | 3.189 | 3.189 | 4.334 | 4.342 | 4.380 | 4.384 |
OT167–OE126 | 2.661 | 2.661 | 2.700 | 2.702 | 2.684 | 2.687 |
OE126–OW1 | 3.687 | 3.688 | 3.703 | 3.685 | 3.717 | 3.598 |
OW1–OPPi | 2.734 | 2.734 | 2.794 | 2.793 | 2.786 | 2.774 |
OC4–OE126 | 4.209 | 4.209 | 3.629 | 3.641 | 3.590 | 3.621 |
OC4–OPPi | 4.875 | 4.875 | 2.695 | 2.695 | 2.703 | 2.722 |
HMBPP angle | ||||||
C2–C3–C4–OC4 | –101.5 | –101.5 | 95.4 | 95.7 | 94.1 | 90.3 |