Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2012 Jul 3;26(10):1250–1277. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.693584

TABLE 6.

Mean (SD) percentage of correct sentence production and comprehension by canonicity and sentence type for each participant group

By Sentence Type
By Canonicity
Canonical
Non-canonical
C NC Active SWQ SR Passive OWQ OR
SPPT Agr 72 (30) 39a,0 (32) 87 (28) 62 (42) 64 (40) 44b,1 (40) 50b,1 (43) 231,2,3 (33)
An 91 (11) 730 (17) 99 (4) 93 (13) 80 (25) 88 (20) 93 (20) 381,2,3,4,5 (37)
SCT Agr 81a (19) 66a,0 (25) 88 (17) 76 (28) 78 (27) 65b,1 (32) 75 (28) 59b,1 (30)
An 95 (9) 880 (10) 98 (6) 95 (11) 94 (16) 88 (16) 91 (17) 86 (20)

SPPT = Sentence Production Priming Test; SCT = Sentence Comprehension Test; Agr = agrammatic; An = anomic; C = canonical sentences; NC = non-canonical sentences; SWQ = subject extracted wh-question; OWQ = object extracted wh-question; SR = subject relative clause; OR = object relative clause. By canonicity, aindicates p < .013 for between-group comparisons and 0indicates p < .01 for within-group comparisons. By sentence type, bindicates p < .0042 for between-group comparisons, and each superscript number indicates significantly greater difficulty with a particular structure compared to active1, SWQ2, SR3, passive4, and OWQ5 at least p < .05 within each group.