Skip to main content
. 2015 May 16;30(10):1605–1614. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv209

Table 1.

Summary of subthemes identified by the narrative synthesis process, organized by theme

Establishing need
  1. Recognition of the importance of PROMs across all stakeholders:
    • Highlight the potential clinical outcomes of PROMs
    • Target evidence at all stakeholders
    • Highlight recommendations from national/international organizations
    • Identify research supporting the need for PROMs
    • Capitalize on the increasing recognition of PROMs in other diseases
    • Utilize the power of patient organizations to lobby policy makers
  1. Agreement that registries are a good way to collect PROMs:
    • Registry-based collection may overcome some of the methodological limitations (e.g. larger samples, multiple time points, ability to account for interactions)
    • Registries can be used as a sampling frame to target specific subgroups
    • Provide evidence that registries are a cost-effective way to collect these data
    • Highlight ability to describe equity of access to treatment/quality assurance
    • Highlight ability to describe characteristics of responders/non-responders
Set up
  1. PROM methodological issues
    • Recognize methodological issues and how these will affect design and interpretation
    • Recognize the importance of using properly translated and validated instruments for a population
    • Consider undertaking a feasibility study when selecting the instruments
    • Consider where the control data for measures came from
  1. PROM methodological expertise
    • Involve experts at all stages of project design and development
    • Provide staff with training in collecting, analysing and interpreting PROMs data
  1. National and international support
    • Mandate or incentivise the collection of PROM data
    • Obtain financial support from respected national and international organizations
    • Coordinate expertise and infrastructure at a national level
    • Understand laws and permissions in different countries with respect to PROMs
  1. Patient and public involvement
    • Generate interest among the public and patients
    • Involve patients in objective setting and the design of data collection and reporting
    • Involve an international umbrella organization of patient associations where possible
  1. International standardization
    • Agree on internationally standardized systems, definitions, data architecture and timings for data collection
    • Aim for an internationally agreed core data set to enable international data pooling
    • Design a system that can be easily adopted by subsequent countries wanting to join
  1. Stakeholder involvement in objective setting
    • Involve all stakeholders in objective setting and design
    • Aim to reach consensus of key objectives at/before the design stage
    • Define relationships and responsibilities at the beginning
    • Avoid having too many stakeholders
  1. Practical considerations including resources
    • Obtain sufficient funding for staff, equipment etc
    • Minimize the burden of administration at the clinic level
    • Provide clear guidelines and training for staff administering PROMs
    • Work out the most cost-effective way of collecting PROMs
    • Consider using a PROM registry that is not disease specific so resources can be shared
    • Set realistic timescales
  1. Design and ongoing evaluation/modification
    • Understand current data collection status of existing registries
    • Offer a range of modes of completion for questionnaires, including paper and electronic.
    • Align the data collection to objectives set by stakeholders
    • Ensure design has capacity for flexibility as the project develops
    • Set criteria for evaluation of project in advance
    • Aim to minimize the burden to patients
    • Consider dividing up the project into a number of work packages, each with its own lead
Maintenance
  1. Technological and information governance issues
    • Ensure lack of familiarity with technology does not limit participation
    • Ensure technology has the capacity for flexibility over time
    • Consider issues of data security and information governance
    • Establish and address the legal and ethical constraints of the country/state
    • Develop a coordinated IT infrastructure
    • Consider availability of technology across different participating countries
    • Maintain database so that patient information is up to date
    • Obtain legal advice on the data sharing agreements that may be necessary
    • Get the technology working before rolling it out-slow technology can be a barrier
  1. Useful high-impact output
    • Maintain interest by maximizing published output in a range of formats
    • Target different stakeholder group with outcomes of PROMs work
    • Present patient-level data in a readily understandable format
    • Highlight the direct benefit to patients from participation
    • Use ongoing nature of data to ensure frequent analysis and dissemination
    • Data should aim to help improve patient care
    • Make data as freely available as possible within the constraints of confidentiality
  1. Maintaining trust/faith in the data
    • Ensure methodological rigour to maintain trust
    • Be aware of the sensitivity of centres to publication of data that reflects poorly on their performance
    • Ensure objectives and evaluation are transparent and set by stakeholders and not any group for example with a vested interest
    • Be aware that PROMs viewed more positively if presented as a care management tool
    • Report characteristics of responders and non-responders