Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep;13(5):436–445. doi: 10.1370/afm.1822

Table 2.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Analysis of Receipt of ART, Cancer Screening, and Health Care Use

Variable Receipt of ART AOR (95% CI)a Colorectal Cancer Screening AOR (95% CI)a Cervical Cancer Screening AOR (95% CI)a Breast Cancer Screening AOR (95% CI)a Any ED Visit AOR (95% CI)a Any Hospital Admission
Model of care delivery
 FP-dominant comanagement 2.04 (1.63–2.25) 1.25 (0.88–1.76) 0.77 (0.47–1.27) 3.90 (1.16–13.09) 1.11 (0.96–1.29) 2.16 (1.75–2.67)
 Specialist-dominant comanagement 2.23 (1.71–2.91) 0.88 (0.59–1.31) 0.72 (0.44–1.18 0.49 (0.13–1.79) 1.11 (0.94–1.31) 1.57 (1.22–2.02)
 Exclusively primary care (ref) 1.00b 1.00b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00b
Family physician HIV experienceb
 ≤5 HIV patients 0.16 (0.12–0.21) 0.85 (0.56–1.29) 1.09 (0.70–1.69) 2.10 (0.84–5.27) 1.16 (0.98–1.37) 1.17 (0.89–1.53)
 6–49 HIV patients 0.20 (0.15–0.27) 0.67 (0.42–1.08) 0.59 (0.35–0.99) 1.69 (0.58–4.91) 1.12 (0.92–1.37) 1.40 (1.02–1.91)
 ≥50 HIV patients (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Interaction modelc FP HIV experience
 FP-dominant comanagementc ≤5 HIV patients 6.27 (2.40–16.34)b 0.98 (0.26–3.63) 1.45 (0.34–6.15) 0.08 (0.01–1.05) 0.65 (0.33–1.29) 1.24 (0.58–2.66)
 FP-dominant comanagementc 6–49 HIV patients 6.33 (2.92–13.71)b 1.17 (0.44–3.07) 0.67 (0.18–2.51) 0.09 (0.01–1.08) 0.85 (0.53–1.36) 0.70 (0.38–1.30)
 SP-dominant comanagementc ≤5 HIV patients 5.92 (4.10–8.57)b 0.76 (0.44–1.30) 0.96 (0.54–1.71) 0.87 (0.21–3.67) 0.90 (0.72–1.14) 0.87 (0.61–1.24)
 SP dominant comanagementc 6–49 HIV patients 4.54 (3.01–6.86)b 0.73 (0.39–1.38) 1.30 (0.67–2.53) 2.06 (0.41–10.36) 1.01 (0.77–1.32) 0.65 (0.43–0.98)
Age, years 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 1.02 (1.00–1.04)b 0.98 (0.97–0.99)b 1.07 (1.01–1.12)b 0.99 (0.98–0.99)b 1.02 (1.02–1.03)b
Sex, female 0.88 (0.74–1.04) 1.05 (0.79–1.39) 1.07 (0.95–1.20) 0.97 (0.82–1.16)
Neighborhood income quintile
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 1.42 (1.12–1.73) 0.95 (0.71–1.27) 0.95 (0.66–1.36) 0.45 (0.20–1.00) 1.15 (1.01–1.30) 1.12 (0.92–1.36)
 Quintile 2 1.05 (0.85–1.28) 0.88 (0.64–1.21) 0.98 (0.66–1.44) 0.32 (0.14–0.76) 1.00 (0.87–1.15) 1.02 (0.83–1.27)
 Quintile 3 0.96 (0.81–1.25) 1.15 (0.83–1.59) 1.18 (0.78–1.77) 0.79 (0.33–1.90) 0.95 (0.82–1.10) 0.96 (0.77–1.20)
 Quintile 4 1.09 (0.88–1.34) 0.86 (0.62–1.21) 1.09 (0.71–1.66) 0.68 (0.27–1.76) 0.90 (0.77–1.04) 0.88 (0.69–1.11)
 Quintile 5 (highest) (ref) 1.00b 1.00 1.00 1.00d 1.00b 1.00
Rurality indexd
 Non–major urban 1.35 (1.04–1.69) 0.95 (0.68–1.32) 0.91 (0.61–1.35) 0.54 (0.25–1.15) 1.49 (1.28–1.73) 1.41 (1.13–1.75)
 Rural 1.18 (0.75–1.88) 0.66 (0.34–1.30) 0.70 (0.31–1.58) 0.38 (0.10–1.54) 1.79 (1.31–2.44) 1.82 (1.22–2.70)
 Urban (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00b 1.00b
Immigrant statusb
 Immigrant from Africa or Caribbean 1.58 (1.24–1.99) 0.90 (0.60–1.34) 1.04 (0.81–1.33) 1.66 (0.90–3.09) 0.77 (0.67–0.90)b 0.80 (0.63–1.02)b
 Immigrant from Europe or western nations 0.78 (0.50–1.24) 1.69 (0.78–3.64) 0.57 (0.23–1.38) 0.40 (0.06–2.82) 0.61 (0.44–0.85) 0.67 (0.38–1.20)
 Immigrant from other country 1.29 (1.00–1.68) 0.97 (0.60–1.57) 0.69 (0.46–1.03) 0.68 (0.28–1.69) 0.71 (0.59–0.84) 0.66 (0.49–0.90)
 Canadian born (ref) 1.00b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mental health diagnosis 0.81 (0.71–0.93)b 0.71 (0.58–0.87)b 0.93 (0.75–1.15) 1.23 (0.77–1.99) 1.37 (1.26–1.50)b 1.28 (1.12–1.46)b
Comorbidity: ADG category
 High 0.69 (0.59–0.82) 1.55 (1.19–2.03) 1.33 (1.01–1.73) 1.84 (0.97–2.48) 3.31 (2.95–3.71)b 3.45 (2.90–4.11)
 Medium 0.88 (0.75–1.02) 1.54 (1.23–1.92) 1.62 (1.27–2.08) 2.31 (1.27–4.21) 1.59 (1.43–1.76) 1.60 (1.35–1.91)
 Low (ref) 1.00b 1.00b 1.00b 1.00b 1.00 1.00b

ADG = aggregated diagnosis group; AOR = adjusted odds ratio; ART = antiretroviral therapy; ED = emergency department; FP = family physician; ref = reference group.

a

Adjusted for all listed patient covariates and interaction term of model of care delivery.

b

Statistically significant (P for overall test of effect <.05).

c

Family physician experience.

d

P = .06.

Note: Analyses account for family physician cluster.