Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 9;5(5):697–707. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0269-y

Table 2.

Numerical data as obtained from PCR amplification by ISSR primers among Ocimum species

Sr. no. Locus name Sequence 5′–3′ GC content (%) Tm Molecular weight (bp) No. of loci No. of polymorphic loci Percent polymorphism (%) PIC value
1 UBC 443 ACACACACACACACACACT 47 49 453–2,159 18 17 94.44 0.909
2 UBC 807 AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGT 47 45 89–1,556 22 22 100 0.930
3 UBC 808 AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAG(CT)C 53 51 604–2,224 13 12 92.30 0.892
4 UBC 818 CACACACACACACAG 53 42 342–1,835 18 17 94.44 0.915
5 UBC 825 ACACACACACACACACT 47 45 446–2,279 20 20 100 0.934
6 UBC 834 AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAG(CT)T 47 49 392–2,597 19 19 100 0.934
7 UBC 840 GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYT 47 45 222–1,952 18 18 100 0.919
8 UBC 841 GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYC 53 47 189–2,940 22 22 100 0.937
9 UBC 855 ACACACACACACACACYT 47 45 238–2,284 15 15 100 0.908
10 ISS RA7 AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGT 48 52 254–1,720 21 21 100 0.930
11 ISS RA12 GAGAGAGAGAGACC 57 40 225–1,984 32 31 96.88 0.943
12 CTC 4RC CTCCTCCTCCTCRC 69 44 307–2,587 20 20 100 0.922
Total 238 234
Average 313–176 19.8 19.5 98.17 0.923