Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 15;9(9):e0004077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004077

Table 2. Loci examined among 439 outbred snails.

Locus a Scaffold b N c Alleles (% Frequency) d Other loci in LD e Infection Odds Impact f References g
sod1 10 439 A (44), B (33), C (21), D (2) bmplys 2.2** [24]
RADres1 115 439 E (68), F (32) RADres2 1.8** this study
RADres2 332 439 G (73), H (16), I (11) RADres1 1.7** this study
bmplys 10 405 J (63), K (37) sod1 1.9** [38]
aif 1380 439 L (59), M (25), N (10), O (6) none none [23]
infPhox 174 439 P (69), Q (23), R (6), S (1) none none [23]
prx1 838 439 T (61), U (36), V (3) none none [23]
grc 1 278 W (38), X (33), Y (29) none none [3]

aName of gene or marker

bScaffold number in B. glabrata reference genome version BglaB1

cNumber of genotyped and phenotyped outbred snails

dFrequency of each allele, named alphabetically

eOther loci showing significant linkage disequilibrium with each locus

fMultiplicative decrease in odds of infection conveyed by each copy of a resistance allele at each locus, significance (p < 0.01) conveyed with **

gFirst description of locus